Artemis II's toilet is a moon mission milestone
99 points
21 hours ago
| 18 comments
| scientificamerican.com
| HN
0x38B
1 hour ago
[-]
More on what astronauts found “objectionable” and “distasteful” with Apollo's system, from the PDF linked in the OP (1):

"In general, the Apollo waste management system worked satisfactorily from an engineering standpoint. From the point of view of crew acceptance, however, the system must be given poor marks. The principal problem with both the urine and fecal collection systems was the fact that these required more manipulation than crewmen were used to in the Earth environment and were, as a consequence, found to be objectionable. The urine receptacle assembly represented an attempt to preclude crew handling of urine specimens but, because urine spills were frequent, the objective of “sanitizing” the process was thwarted.

The fecal collection system presented an even more distasteful set of problems. The collection process required a great deal of skill to preclude escape of feces from the collection bag and consequent soiling of the crew, their clothing, or cabin surfaces. The fecal collection process was, moreover, extremely time consuming because of the level of difficulty involved with use of the system. An Apollo 7 astronaut estimated the time required to correctly accomplish the process at 45 minutes.* Good placement of fecal bags was difficult to attain; this was further complicated by the fact that the flap at the back of the constant wear garment created an opening that was too small for easy placement of the bags.** As was noted earlier, kneading of the bags was required for dispersal of the germicide.

*Entry in the log of Apollo 7 by Astronaut Walter Cunningham.

**The configuration of the constant wear garments on later Apollo missions were modified to correct this problem."

1: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19760005603/downloads/19...

reply
pbhjpbhj
3 minutes ago
[-]
Did they not have the astronauts simulate the mission beforehand, on Earth? Wear the clothing, eat the meals, use the toilet, etc?

It sounds like that would have allowed them to fix the suit before they went?

They must have eaten the meals and such to be sure they could function, make sure they didn't have any intolerance, for example?

reply
Alupis
2 hours ago
[-]
Listening to the live stream yesterday evening - they performed a significant amount of troubleshooting for the toilet. This required consulting with a full team of experts, including a "Toilet Lead". It seems it wasn't "flushing" waste into the collection bag or something similar - but they were eventually able to get it working.

I found the language NASA and the astronauts used to communicate absolutely hilarious - "Yes, we're excited and eager to begin immediate fluid disposal!"

Glad they got it working - best of luck to Atemis II mission!

reply
sillysaurusx
23 minutes ago
[-]
Apparently the way they got it working was to power cycle the toilet.
reply
whackernews
29 minutes ago
[-]
I love this. No matter what we do and how far we push the limits of humanity, we still have to shit.
reply
azalemeth
1 hour ago
[-]
Toileting is really fecking important. As someone with a spinal injury you really don't realise just how important until it goes wrong.

Apparently one of the down sides about the previous system was that the separation of solid and liquid excreta ideally required someone to separate their excretion of both kinds. Apparently this is something that male astronauts found much much easier than female ones. Artemis's toilet can handle both at the same time.

I still think they have the good old fashioned Maximum Absorbency Garment for space walks though. (CF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_Absorbency_Garment)

reply
amelius
1 hour ago
[-]
> separation of solid and liquid excreta

this invention might be of use in livestock farming.

reply
OJFord
1 hour ago
[-]
GP is saying that was previously required, not that it was invented. The new one can handle the mixture; not necessarily (presumably not?) by separating it.
reply
faster
2 hours ago
[-]
I worked on the shuttle for a summer a long time ago, and my group's admin was obsessed with the toilet plumbing so she had engineers stopping by with specs and diagrams a few times per week. True story: there was a component in the liquid waste system called the "last drop pinch tube". She laughed about that for weeks.
reply
detourdog
1 hour ago
[-]
One of the good laughs I had watching 2001 was Haywood reading the instructions for the toilet. The joke being we have evolved to the point that our most basic human functions has become complex.

https://sites.google.com/site/theageofplastic3d/2001s-zero-g...

reply
idatum
29 minutes ago
[-]
Haywood reads anxiously! Memorable scene.
reply
fwipsy
5 minutes ago
[-]
It's so ironic reading about all of the Orion heat shield engineering problems but at least they have a groundbreaking new toilet!!
reply
beloch
48 minutes ago
[-]
Reduced need for waste disposal is one of the mixed blessings of a steady diet of MRE's (sometimes called "Meals Refusing to Exit"). It's sobering to realize that anyone who has ever set foot on the moon was most likely backed up in a bad way when they stepped out of their LEM.
reply
JumpCrisscross
20 hours ago
[-]
This is one of those stupid, unglamorous works that legitimately facilitates long-term space exploration ambitions in a way just focusing on the sexy bits, e.g. propulsion.
reply
giantrobot
1 hour ago
[-]
I gauge the seriousness of all manned space exploration proposals by the attention paid to the toilets. If the toilets are not a solved problem with many nines of reliability, you're just writing science function and are not at all serious about actual manned space exploration. Toilets are the brown M&M clause[0] of manned spaceflight proposals.

Toilets are unglamorous in the extreme but absolutely vital. Humans make hazardous and potentially deadly waste. Every day. It needs to be safely discarded/contained. In a sealed environment in microgravity it's even more dangerous than it is on Earth.

Aerosolized fecal matter can enter the lungs and cause deadly infections. Entering the digestive system can cause debilitating (possibly deadly) illness. Temporary blindness if it gets in the eyes. It can also cause mechanical or electrical problems if it gets in equipment. All of these can lead to a mission failure and in extreme instances a total loss of the crew. Apollo 8 was extremely lucky that Frank Borman's illness didn't cause more problems.

If you're not thinking logistics and infrastructure you're not really serious about an endeavor.

[0] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/why-did-van-hale...

reply
mmooss
50 minutes ago
[-]
I see your point. Out of curiosity:

> In a sealed environment in microgravity it's even more dangerous than it is on Earth. / Aerosolized fecal matter can enter the lungs and cause deadly infections.

Would the air filtration / recycling system minimize this risk?

reply
giantrobot
30 minutes ago
[-]
The air filtration will actually help spread aerosols because air currents will carry them through the cabin before they're captured by a filter.

A high power "eliminate aerosols" mode would be one of those infrastructure things that need to be designed (and tested). Even then a single compartment spacecraft like the Orion or Dragon wouldn't have anywhere for the crew to bivouac while some aerosol evacuation mode was active. So you'd want a whole procedure designed around it.

Part of the need for the Apollo Constant Wear Garments was to make up for the lack of faculties in the command module and LEM. Such a thing would be impractical for a long duration mission so toilets (and waste disposal in general) need to be a reliably solved problem.

reply
mmooss
6 minutes ago
[-]
Good points. A few hot takes:

> The air filtration will actually help spread aerosols because air currents will carry them through the cabin before they're captured by a filter.

The toilet facilities could have input / suction into the air filtration system. Maybe wise anyway.

> A high power "eliminate aerosols" mode would be one of those infrastructure things that need to be designed (and tested).

I expect the technology is mature in industrial settings, though of course that is much different than microgravity and the constrained resources of the spacecraft. Maybe it exists on the space station? That context still seems significantly different.

> a single compartment spacecraft like the Orion or Dragon wouldn't have anywhere for the crew to bivouac

In their spacesuits, though their exteriors may need decontamination. Maybe they just go outside, though probably not a great idea to have the entire crew outside the spacecraft simultaneously! Maybe in an emergency.

reply
mememememememo
2 hours ago
[-]
It is the plumbing, not the porcelain.
reply
trhway
1 hour ago
[-]
a good attempt at popularization of the issue in Big Bang Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrX3EmdKtRc

reply
furyofantares
1 hour ago
[-]
I just tuned into the NASA live stream after this and the first, and only, thing I've heard is "we've had a successful ejection. toilet is go for use"
reply
FartinMowler
1 hour ago
[-]
Finally, some deshitification news on HN!
reply
clutter55561
1 hour ago
[-]
Very good. Great name as well.
reply
convexly
24 minutes ago
[-]
All the advanced engineering in the world and you still need to figure out how a toilet works in zero gravity.
reply
caminanteblanco
2 hours ago
[-]
Relevantly, the Artemis 2 waste management system was non functional for a bit: https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/02/artemis-ii-fl...
reply
joshstrange
9 hours ago
[-]
While space has always interested me quite a bit, I've never looked into the toilet situation and I had this scene [0] from an unrealistic kids movie firmly fixed in my brain as "this is how they use the restroom in space, or something better since that movie is old".

[0] https://youtu.be/pJQGJmYKWZ0?t=131

reply
duskwuff
2 hours ago
[-]
reply
irishcoffee
2 hours ago
[-]
I always think of Apollo 13 (the movie): oh look, constellation u-rine
reply
gcanyon
2 hours ago
[-]
They should have trained plumbers to be astronauts instead of training astronauts to be plumbers. (Armageddon reference)

But seriously, although I guess it’s fair to say that errors will occur, still: they couldn’t get the plumbing right?

reply
stickfigure
10 minutes ago
[-]
Great, but robots don't poop.
reply
themafia
2 hours ago
[-]
> Early toilets on both the space shuttle and the International Space Station (ISS) used this vacuum system

For liquid waste. This was not exactly the case for solid waste. Effectively it was just a tank. It had something like a "net" in it, this was connected to a shaft, through a gear, to another shaft at the front of the seat. The commander would, every 7 days or so, "actuate the mechanism" to rotate the net and to gather all the waste and compact it into one side of the toilet.

Many commanders said this was the most stressful part of the mission as the mechanism was somewhat delicate and could easily break. In that case you had to don a glove and manually do the work the net was otherwise doing.

If that completely failed, yes, the shuttle had backup "Apollo bags" stored in the middeck lockers.

reply
ericpauley
21 hours ago
[-]
Thoroughly enjoyed reading this, especially the author’s repeated obsession on the door vs. curtain innovation…
reply
fredgrott
1 hour ago
[-]
and here I though they were talking about MS products....my bad...
reply