The many failures leading to the LiteLLM compromise
4 points
2 hours ago
| 1 comment
| lwn.net
| HN
6thbit
2 hours ago
[-]
i like the efforts behind sigstore.dev project.

And while I do think code signing alone would’ve helped in the recent issues, what I’d like to see is a sort of automated package scanner that searches for this kind of malware and then publishes a signed report enumerating the things verified alongisde package pypi metadata.

Then I could verify both the package and the scanners result and decide to update or not.

i know this is day dreaming cause who would sponsor scanning and attesting every open source project, anthropic?

reply