Internet outage in Iran reaches 1,008 hours
80 points
3 hours ago
| 7 comments
| mastodon.social
| HN
BariumBlue
1 hour ago
[-]
Apparently there have been IRGC and basij curfew patrols shooting at buildings / windows of people who sing or shout anti regime songs and slogans. Apparently they are also (at least in some cases) dressing as women to avoid airstrikes. There has been very little photage and info coming out of Iran though.

I still believe the Iranian government is more afraid of it's people than of the US and Israel - the US and Israel can bomb leadership and materiel, but without ground troops, regime capitulation is unlikely, unless the populace can themselves overthrow the govt (though that is hard to do when there is a major imbalance in who has guns).

reply
jncfhnb
34 minutes ago
[-]
This is all likely true. Although I feel people undersell how they work together.

Iranians broadly hate their government, yeah. But the thing that gets them rioting is economic failure. Which the strikes have exacerbated.

Social media is swarmed by people saying it’ll be like Iraq and Iranians will hate the US for its actions. I’m not convinced. My small anecdata of Iranian friends with contacts in Iran agrees with me.

I think we could see regime change within a decade.

reply
cpncrunch
5 minutes ago
[-]
Why wont a general strike work? Not enough support? People have never had freedom, so dont understand they have 100% ability to bring down govt if they wanted?
reply
payamb
1 minute ago
[-]
Due to years of corruption and mismanagement, leading to high inflation and prices most people are living pay check to pay check and they won’t be able to literally feed themselves
reply
gambutin
1 hour ago
[-]
Noteworthy: It’s not that no one in Iran has no access. Actually some have internet access via “white SIM cards” (1). Reportedly 50,000 or so.

Essentially, they’ve created a two-tier system controlling who can access the internet.

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_SIM_Card

reply
traceroute66
39 minutes ago
[-]
> Noteworthy: It’s not that no one in Iran has no access. Actually some have internet access via “white SIM cards”

Erm, dude, you did look at the graph on the Mastodon post linked to, right ?

You see that bit where it falls off a cliff to 0% netblocks ?

"white SIM card" or not, you're not getting internet if there's no BGP routes being announced.

The only way around 0 BGP announcements would be satellite...

I suspect your "white SIM card" was a pre-war status-quo ...

reply
dataflow
29 minutes ago
[-]
> Erm, dude, you did look at the graph on the Mastodon post linked to, right ? You see that bit where it falls off a cliff to 0% netblocks ?

Not sure if we're all looking at the same plot, but I see things hovering above zero, not exactly at zero.

reply
traceroute66
52 minutes ago
[-]
Looking at it from an alternative angle, the Iranians are not stupid.

They know leaving the internet online would be beneficial for their adversaries, perhaps especially as Israel is one of them, and Israel's use of cyber is no secret.

So by killing the internet, they have an instant air-gap firewall.

Making the most of the levers they have fighting asymmetric warfare.

reply
jncfhnb
33 minutes ago
[-]
It’s very economically harmful to be disconnected. That’s the downside
reply
traceroute66
32 minutes ago
[-]
> It’s very economically harmful to be disconnected. That’s the downside

I mean, sure. But then being at war is also economically harmful. :)

reply
jncfhnb
17 minutes ago
[-]
I guess. But the framing here is not “clever, innovative IRGC” so much as oppressive regime fucking over it’s people to retain control.
reply
JohnnyLarue
1 hour ago
[-]
Bombing civilian infrastructure didn't turn the Internet back on? I don't believe that.
reply
curiousObject
2 hours ago
[-]
That’s unbroken 6 weeks of no direct access for almost everyone

Of course information does still get in and out, but that is severely throttled

reply
reliabilityguy
1 hour ago
[-]
Is Iranian infra centralized on the similar fashion like in Belarus?
reply
alephnerd
1 hour ago
[-]
It's way more centralized.

Iran has been rolling out the National Information Network (essentially a whitelisted internet) since the Green Revolution [0] back in 2009-12. Iran has a surprisingly robust domestic ecosystem of hyperscalers [1] and telco infra [6][7] built out over the past decade with limited outside involvement and a severe sanctions regime, and have even started exporting Iranian IT services to Uganda [2], Kenya [3], South Africa [4], Venezuela [5], Russia [8], and China [8].

Iran also uses a two-tier SIM card system - ideologically vetted individuals get a "white" SIM which gives full ingress/egress outside the NIN and others have a normal SIM that can be blacklisted from egressing outside the NIN.

Notice how Iranian websites have a page saying "Transferring to Website" - that's the gateway page for the NIN.

[0] - https://citizenlab.ca/irans-national-information-network/

[1] - https://www.arvancloud.ir/fa

[2] - https://tvbrics.com/en/news/uganda-and-iran-to-boost-ict-co-...

[3] - https://mail.techreviewafrica.com/public/news/1361/kenya-and...

[4] - https://www.samenacouncil.org/samena_daily_news?news=64545

[5] - https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/08/06/752585/Iranian-fibe...

[6] - https://zmc.co.ir/

[7] - https://www.rayafiber.com/en/home

[8] - https://www.kharon.com/brief/iran-sanctions-maximum-pressure...

reply
newsclues
18 minutes ago
[-]
How does internet shutdown affect bitcoin mining in Iran?
reply
alephnerd
11 minutes ago
[-]
Iran has been under export controls for dual use technology for decades. Getting the amount of GPUs needed to conduct bitcoin mining was nigh impossible.

Bitcoin and Crypto as a shadow financial system was enabled by Qatar and the UAE where there are dedicated deal desks that work on ExAmerica trades.

This is why the IRGC striking Qatar and the UAE was such a bad move. Even companies in the PRC try to follow American sanctions regimes because trade with Japan+SK+ASEAN is higher priority than trade with Russia or Iran.

reply
gambutin
1 hour ago
[-]
Is there a reasonable workaround for this?
reply
alephnerd
1 hour ago
[-]
Starlink or any other sort of satellite internet, but these are relatively easy to jam and detect. There are ways to minimize that but obviously not available to civilians.

The issue is, if you control the Network DMZ, it's extremely difficult to bypass. In Xinjiang and Tibet (which has a similar setup) they used to use smuggled Kazakh, Nepali, and Indian SIM cards but that was cracked down.

A lot of the info from inside Iran that is not regime connected is coming from areas in Iranian Kurdistan where an Iraqi SIM could be smuggled or accessed somewhat easier than other areas.

reply
gambutin
54 minutes ago
[-]
That’s interesting. Could they somehow do peer-to-peer anonymously until the packages reach the border?
reply
alephnerd
23 minutes ago
[-]
P2P is only as safe as it's nodes. Iran has around 1 million IRGC, Army, and Foreign Shia Militia deployed in a country of around 90 million.

Mind you that organization has been severely degraded, but that only scares civilians even more as functionaries are much more trigger happy (rape [0], summary execution [1], torture [2] are already the norm).

That makes covert P2P much harder.

[0] - https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/12/iran-security...

[1] - https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/01/iran-authorit...

[2] - https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde13/0673/2026/en/

reply
metalman
2 hours ago
[-]
and during that time those people waging war against Iran, murdered one Irainian child every 30 minuits, not counting the other children murdered by the genociders in Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine.

predictable down vote

but listen up, Iran has made a tactical move in this, but the implication is that they, like Afganistan are consideriing a strategic move, and many others are watching.

more down voting, which is an excellent demonstration of how the internet is used by those that "own" it

reply