Bodega cats of New York
130 points
by zdw
4 days ago
| 8 comments
| bodegacatsofnewyork.com
| HN
culi
2 hours ago
[-]
It seems it might've been taken down but there used to be an app called ShopCats that was a crowd-sourced version of this concept

https://shopcats.en.softonic.com/iphone

reply
WetBurritoLuv
3 hours ago
[-]
I read Shop Cats of New York a few years ago, and it was great

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/shop-cats-of-new-york-tamar...

reply
chirau
5 hours ago
[-]
When i first realized that their primary purpose was to get rid of rats, I had quite the chuckle.
reply
sdrm
5 hours ago
[-]
Paris should take notes
reply
nonethewiser
5 hours ago
[-]
Yeah this is why I dont find it endearing. It's just pointing to unsanitary conditions. It's ubiquitous in NYC which may have dulled some senses but it's not ubiquitous everywhere.

Cat's themselves are not very sanitary. Better than rats, sure, but they are a source of toxoplasmosis which is very dangerous to pregnant women for example. Limiting exposure is manageable when keeping as a pet, but its a terrible baseline for a cramped public store.

reply
technothrasher
10 minutes ago
[-]
The rats that the cats are keeping out of the stores are a much larger source of pathogen transmission to humans than the cats are. Not only do rats carry many more dangerous diseases than cats, but both can also transmit toxoplasmosis to humans. As it is transmitted through contact with feces, from which of the two are you more likely to encounter feces spread all over the store?

So, while I actually find both rats and cats endearing, I'd take the cats over wild rats in the stores any day.

reply
jjtheblunt
4 hours ago
[-]
> Cat's themselves are not very sanitary. Better than rats, sure, but they are a source of toxoplasmosis

Hyperbole and toxoplasmosis go well together.

In particular: it's a limited time window when an infected feline could transmit toxoplasmosis. It can be dangerous to pregnancies, or immuno-compromised individuals.

Most humans (and other beings) aren't pregnant or immunocompromised, but the drama of the topic gets clicks, so it's a meme of sorts, and it resurfaces every six months or so in the news as if a revelation.

reply
kirubakaran
3 hours ago
[-]
> Most humans (and other beings) aren't pregnant or immunocompromised

Just because pregnant and immuno-compromised people are in the minority, it's not a big deal?

reply
sporadicism
3 hours ago
[-]
Additionally, I can't imagine being blase about gaining parasites just because you're not pregnant or immunocompromised.
reply
jjtheblunt
3 hours ago
[-]
no one is being blase : we're immersed in a biological world teeming with such critters...and we exist through evolutionary adaptation to such. for fun, check out mites around eyelashes, for an innocuous example.
reply
jjtheblunt
3 hours ago
[-]
it's a big deal for some, but not for all individuals, is the point clearly made.
reply
kirubakaran
3 hours ago
[-]
Well you wrote "Hyperbole and toxoplasmosis go well together". It's not "hyperbole" to care about others, however few they are, even though you yourself might not be at risk, right?

But I don't mean to be confrontational. I understand that it is probably annoying to hear toxoplasmosis talked about like it is black death.

reply
colechristensen
2 hours ago
[-]
A third of the entire human population is infected with toxoplasmosis, in some places nearly every human.

If you put humans in a sterile bubble you get a different set of diseases, to a considerably greater degree because your immune system evolved in an environment where you actually got infections.

reply
kirubakaran
1 hour ago
[-]
By that logic, we shouldn't be fighting malaria in Africa either.

Are there any benefits to toxoplasmosis besides some people finding the vector cute? The alternative isn't living in a sterile bubble.

reply
alexjplant
4 hours ago
[-]
> they are a source of toxoplasmosis

You are far more likely to get it from undercooked beef or shellfish than from a cat. Less than 1% of cats broadly are shedding it at any given time and that number is even lower for indoor cats. If, like me, you have a penchant for rare steak and beef tartare then there's a decent chance that you have it.

reply
bombcar
5 hours ago
[-]
The vast majority of NYCs problem can be tied to their trash debacle, which is so outlandish it's hard for anyone not from there to believe is a real thing in 2206.

It appears they finally discovered dumpsters recently: https://www.amny.com/news/curbside-empire-trash-bins-coming-...

(Another crazy trash city was (is?) Seattle with their weird judgement causing everyone to compact their trash.)

reply
blatherard
4 hours ago
[-]
And the difficulties of trash handling are further traceable, at least in Manhattan, to the decision by city planners in 1811 to not build alleys. No obvious place to store trash, nor an obvious place to put it when being collected.

If you drive in Manhattan you'll also notice a whole lot of delivery trucks and other vehicles blocking lanes, and a lot of designated delivery-only parking zones. This is rooted in the same lack of alleys.

reply
RandallBrown
4 hours ago
[-]
What about Seattle's trash was crazy? I've lived here for 14 years and never noticed anything weird about it compared to other places I've lived.
reply
buildsjets
3 hours ago
[-]
He's being overly dramatic, and it's not a "Judgment", it's simple economics. Seattle is basically out of landfill space, the Cedar Hills landfill is a 96.6% capacity, so all trash needs to be trucked out of state. To minimize the cost of doing that they encourage sending most of your waste stream to recycling or compost instead. Many of the local trash haul haulers provide nice large recycle and compost bins, but a tiny landfill waste container unless you pay extra, hence the necessary compacting and stomping. My hauler charges an extra $25 fee if the flip-down lid on the garbage container is not fully closed, and they send you a photo and video of your non-compliant container along with the bill.

Again, this is not a judgement or a mandate. You can pay for a larger garbage can or for a multiple garbage cans if you want to. But you have to pay for how your consumption habits impact the cost of disposal.

reply
bombcar
4 hours ago
[-]
IIRC they got a judgement against them a long time ago and charged more per can to pay for it - but my memory may be off. All I know is all the older homes have trash compactors and there was something called the "Seattle Stomp" and it wasn't a dance. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1995/jan/26/seattle-stomp-...
reply
buildsjets
3 hours ago
[-]
You do not recall correctly. That's not an article about Seattle. It's an article about Spokane, which is little college town close to five hours away from Seattle. There was no legal judgement, and there was no municipal government action here. A private corporation raised their prices, and their customers reacted by trying to get more for their money. John Smith's invisible hand continues to sculpt our reality.
reply
tombert
2 hours ago
[-]
I was baffled when I first moved to NYC and found out that people just throw their garbage onto the sidewalk.

I have the wheely bin now, which is good, but it's insane that it took until 2025 to actually require it. Probably the only good thing Eric Adams did.

reply
yardie
2 hours ago
[-]
The reasoning gets worse the further you peel back that onion. Basically dumpsters are too large for sidewalks. Logically, it would make sense to put them on the curb. But no, drivers would complain because having to give up any curbside parking whatsoever.
reply
addaon
5 hours ago
[-]
> 2206

Let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

[Posted from 2026.]

reply
dirck-norman
4 hours ago
[-]
NYC was built without alleyways and much of NYC is single vaulted sewer systems due to its age. There is no space to put underground trash bins.

NYC is also non-uniform, so there are different types of trucks and streets.

Adam's admin largely solved this during his term, but the above ground bins are unpopular because they're ugly and then it takes time to retrofit the garbage trucks for mechanical pickup.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/02/upshot/nyc-tr...

reply
pcrh
5 hours ago
[-]
It's still a problem in 2206?
reply
bombcar
5 hours ago
[-]
Oh sheesh now I have to leave the typo in (and it'll probably be correct, at least according to the historical documents: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20SwR_zIWv4 )
reply
carabiner
2 hours ago
[-]
I'm from 2207 and it's not a big deal.
reply
bombcar
2 hours ago
[-]
Don't listen to the raccoon.
reply
vedaba
4 hours ago
[-]
You just angered a lot of cat people
reply
delecti
4 hours ago
[-]
In my experience most people lovingly refer to their cats in negative-sounding ways. One of the terms of endearment we used for our most recent cat was "stinky little piss baby". I think most cat owners are well aware that they're unsanitary creatures.
reply
Jtsummers
4 hours ago
[-]
If your housecat stinks, it's likely unhealthy or you're not providing it with a clean litterbox or you have insufficient litterboxes for the number of cats you have.
reply
delecti
30 minutes ago
[-]
He got the nickname while he was dying of cancer. He had stopped grooming himself because of his medications.

So you aren't entirely wrong, but rest assured that we were agonizingly aware of the ways in which he was unhealthy.

reply
bluefirebrand
3 hours ago
[-]
Calling your cat stinky does not actually mean they smell bad
reply
jjtheblunt
4 hours ago
[-]
dog person here : they're unsanitary how? they constantly fastidously clean themselves, from what i see. dogs roll in rotting anything for sport.
reply
delusional
3 hours ago
[-]
I suppose they're unsanitary in the same way all animals that aren't humans are: They don't was their hands? Cats don't strike me a particularly dirty creatures. They're not exactly clean and well groomed from nature, but no animal really is.
reply
kevin_thibedeau
2 hours ago
[-]
If you covered yourself in spit would that be sanitary?
reply
jackconsidine
4 hours ago
[-]
Was so excited when I saw this link. Was hoping it would be more like the Trees of New York [0], but appears to be a book.

The bodega in my last neighborhood (Fort Greene) featured an orange cat, Ice Spice. Spice birthed Olivia who now has loads of kittens. They wander in and own like they own the place, even whining at customers to open the doors for them. Here's a picture I took of Olivia on top of the tobacco products

[0] https://tree-map.nycgovparks.org/tree-map/neighborhood/177

[1] https://ibb.co/h1cJTs0g

reply
jjtheblunt
4 hours ago
[-]
That sounds profoundly irresponsible of the associated humans.
reply
jkestner
4 hours ago
[-]
True. It's unconscionable to give a cat access to cigarettes.
reply
fhdkweig
3 hours ago
[-]
But hilarious to give a raccoon alcohol.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=raccoon+liquor+store

reply
rafram
3 hours ago
[-]
Lots of bodega cats are allowed to go out on the street. They usually don't wander far. Cats know where home is.
reply
crooked-v
3 hours ago
[-]
It would be irresponsible for a pet owner... but you have to understand the context is New York rats, which exist in immense numbers, massively beyond every other major US city, because of a century of just leaving trash piled up on the sidewalk (https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-11-27/new-yo...).

Bodega cats aren't pets, they're a cheap and low-impact way to keep rats from moving into the bodega en masse. If one gets run over by a car, that's just an unfortunate cost of business for a bodega owner who needs an option that works better than putting glue traps every five feet or fumigating the entire place every week.

reply
cgg1
4 hours ago
[-]
Can’t wait for the sequel:

Bodega Rats of New York

reply
noplace1ikegone
4 hours ago
[-]
You can’t have a great product without proper security.
reply
enraged_camel
2 hours ago
[-]
I strongly recommend the 2016 documentary titled 'Kedi', which is about the cats of Istanbul. Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKq7UqplcL8
reply
xoa
2 hours ago
[-]
Seconding this, it's what I immediately thought of. It's a really beautifully made movie. And yes cats are front and center, but it's also using them as a window on humanity, the city of Instanbul and its living history from a very different perspective. It's a very sober film as well, celebrating life but also not shying away from death and the passing of time. The "cat's eye view" is a more 3D sort of feel from a lot of the typical explorations of a city, going at ground level, up and down buildings in 3D etc.

It's become a family favorite film we tend to watch each winter now. All ages can take something from it.

reply
brenschluss
1 hour ago
[-]
Is it just me or is it a huge letdown that the text is all AI-generated? Or at least, in the same kind of saccharine style? Are people not able to detect this?
reply
Sharlin
24 minutes ago
[-]
Didn't seem AI-generated to me. Just the short, three-word-sentence pithy style that's become really popular these days that LLMs have learned to ape. But IMO it actually works well here, it reminds me of Peter Watts's very human style (cf. eg. https://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=11546).
reply