I vibecoded a simple web app using Sharp that allowed be to quickly browse any local image folder and view them as "almost" volumetric 3d scenes in a VR headset.

I precomputed and cached each one so it was nearly instant. The effect - although only a crude wrapper around what Sharp already does - was quite transformative and mesmerising. Just the ease of pointing it at any folder of photos and viewing them fully spatially.

It was a bit of a mess code-wise and kinda specific to my local setup - but I should really clean it up deploy it somewhere for other people to try. Although I keep assuming someone else will do it before me and make a better job of it.

Hi HN, author here. SHARP is Apple's recent single-image 3D Gaussian splatting model (https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10685). Their reference code is PyTorch + a pretty heavy pipeline; I wanted to see if it could run in a browser with no server hop, so I exported the predictor to ONNX and ran it via onnxruntime-web with the WebGPU EP.

What works: drop in an image, get a .ply you can download or preview live, all on your machine — your image never leaves the tab. The model is large (~2.4 GB sidecar) so first load is slow on a cold cache, but inference itself is a few seconds on a recent Mac.

Caveats: SHARP's released weights are research-use only (Apple's model license, not the code's). I host the exported ONNX on R2 so thedemo "just works", but you can also export your own from the upstream Apple repo and upload locally.

Happy to talk about it in the comments :)

Nice, I've also been doing some similarly neat things via ONNX web at https://intabai.dev (caution, just PoC tools atm, only Chrome tested, only some mobile devices work, no filters).

I think all-client-side in-browser AI imagery is becoming very doable and has lots of privacy benefits. However ONNX web leaves a lot to be desired (I had to proto patch many pytorch conversions because things like Conv3D ops had webgpu issues IIRC). I have yet to try Apache TVM webgpu approaches or any others, but I feel if the webgpu space were more invested in, running these models would be even more feasible.

Did not work in Firefox on Linux, but it runs on Chrome.

Have to admit, I dont get it. I tried it with 3 landscape photos I have and the results were nowhere close to the results in the demo, but that just speaks to the model.

Regardless, its very cool as a browser tech showcase.