PySimpleGUI 6
54 points
2 days ago
| 9 comments
| github.com
| HN
crazybonkersai
1 hour ago
[-]
First they made it commercial. Then they realised there were not enough people prepared to pay for the project and shut down the project. But now it is back in free form?
reply
geophph
1 hour ago
[-]
Seems it. A nice gesture of sorts to make it available to everyone after the updates made during the commercial phase.
reply
dilawar
2 hours ago
[-]
This project started when I started my Ph.D.. I had a few interactions with the author when I added UI to some programs I wanted to showcase as TA.

Every time I needed a GUI, I reached out to this library. Very beginner friendly. Good memories.

reply
mutagen
1 hour ago
[-]
Great to see this back as Open Source (LGPL 3.0). However, it points out the continuous need for proper funding for Open Source. Tough in ZIRP times, exponentially more difficult in more difficult economic times.
reply
DonThomasitos
1 hour ago
[-]
It would be great to have a few screenshots on the readme.md or Doc pages to understand quickly what we‘re talking about.
reply
harwoodr
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
bobajeff
1 hour ago
[-]
I remember looking into GUI libraries for Python a while back and this one and qt came up.

However I ended up settling on making a Web UI served via FastAPI. I'm still happy about that decision but this one sounded really nice back then.

reply
nomel
52 minutes ago
[-]
WebUI (assuming you're mean python-WebUI) doesn't actually include any UI. This is why PySimpleGUI is nice...you can make a button!
reply
bobajeff
22 minutes ago
[-]
No, sorry, I wasn't referring to any library. I just meant a UI I made out of HTML, JavaScript and CSS.
reply
IshKebab
47 minutes ago
[-]
Hmm apart from distribution (which is a pain to set up) I still don't think you can beat QtWidgets and QtCreator for simplicity of getting a professional GUI. It has a form editor that actually works. I think maybe the only one I've ever used. Then you can pretty much just click on buttons and add event handlers. Very easy to get going and it scales very far.

There are a few downsides... there are better options than C++ these days (Rust most obviously), QtWidgets is in maintenance mode, it's a bit of a pain to make an installer from your app, and it doesn't really support modern styling.

But I'd still pick it over this in a heartbeat.

reply
NewsaHackO
4 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, especially with AI unless the user has literally never programmed anything before, it seem actually easier to use Qt for something like this (honestly, it probably would be easier to just make a webapp if they have no experience)
reply
xenophonf
48 minutes ago
[-]
I stopped using this when the dev did their rugpull and won't go back.
reply
dartharva
1 hour ago
[-]
LOL, I remember this one being a famous traitor to FOSS by starting out as a community project and then closing doors to make money from it. Guess they weren't able to make any money after all. Karma in action.
reply
matsemann
1 hour ago
[-]
Or it's just another example of why FOSS fails - people (like you) expect free labor and never want to pay for it. They tried to make it a sustainable project, and it would probably have died even earlier if they didn't.

> For the last 5 years, PySimpleGUI offered free software with the hope of sustaining the project with donations. We appreciate the support we received, but the amount has been too small to support the project.

reply
ltbarcly3
1 hour ago
[-]
I think AI coding has made these "we dumb down a real UI framework for you" libraries obsolete. Anyone can get a GTK or QT app up and running now. This isn't a criticism, they were very useful to build GUIs in the past, but now they are just obsolete and more likely to introduce bugs or limitations you can't work around than to help much.
reply
marshray
51 seconds ago
[-]
Is this a new form of gatekeeping?

I.e., "too human-friendly to survive in the presence of The Great AI™".

If so, where does that lead us?

reply