Chrome's AI features may be hogging 4GB of your computer storage
37 points
2 hours ago
| 9 comments
| theverge.com
| HN
seam_carver
2 minutes ago
[-]
I recently switched to Safari, I'm actually very impressed by how well it works.
reply
Holacc
1 hour ago
[-]
The local model powers the features nobody uses. The cloud model powers the feature everyone sees. You pay 4GB for the illusion of privacy.
reply
gruez
22 minutes ago
[-]
>You pay 4GB for the illusion of privacy.

How's this conspiracy supposed to work? A technical audience who cares about privacy aren't going to be placated by 4GB sitting on their disk. They're going to want some sort of analysis (like http interception), or probably not use chrome in the first place. A non-technical audience isn't going to make the association between 4GB of disk usage and the privacy implications.

reply
chronc6393
7 minutes ago
[-]
> They're going to want some sort of analysis

And I want $1 billion dollars.

Doesn’t mean someone’s going to give it to me.

reply
thunderbong
48 minutes ago
[-]
From 5 days ago, 1138 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019219

reply
Weryj
52 minutes ago
[-]
And Claude is hogging 12G for Cowork which I don’t want.
reply
iamkrazy
39 minutes ago
[-]
First IE, now Chrome. What gets into these companies heads once they get biggest market share? And the people working for these companies. How do you sleep at night bro?
reply
superkuh
1 hour ago
[-]
4GB should be nothing.

It's crazy to me how consumer computer storage has stalled out at the 2010 level for so long. And if anything we're going backwards now in 2026. We should be having many TBs in our home computers and laptops. Instead most users are still stuck with 256GB and trying to tetris around to fit even their average amount of small data.

reply
kn100
1 hour ago
[-]
I reckon until the recent ai-gobbles-everything-up phenomena, this was mainly an Apple problem. Even fairly budget PCs come with at least 1tb of storage. Considering much beyond 2tb NAND gets scary pricing wise, I'm not that surprised we don't see much beyond that.
reply
superkuh
56 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, but I don't think it was just Apple. The switch to charge trap based SSD storage set all pre-built consumer computers back a full decade in terms of storage size. We were only just getting back beyond 2010 levels when the megacorps started buying up all the flash fab capacity and now even most of the HDD plates are going to enterprise.
reply
goalieca
1 hour ago
[-]
Ironically, the AI datacenter boom is also buying up all the storage.
reply
jmclnx
1 hour ago
[-]
Positive reinforcement anyone :) Anyway to me, 4G seems a bit lite for AI.

I always avoided Chrome as much as possible, now I have a real reason to do so.

I wonder if Chromium-based browsers is or will do the same?

reply
zb3
1 hour ago
[-]
Did anyone extract these weights so we can run Gemini Nano locally? Is it better than Gemma 4?
reply
add-sub-mul-div
1 hour ago
[-]
Annoying, but are the kind of people still using Chrome really that discerning about what's going on behind the scenes on their device?
reply
llbbdd
37 minutes ago
[-]
No they're too busy working to be pearl clutching about 4gb in 2026
reply