HDMI 2.1 Display Stream Compression (DSC) Ready for Amdgpu Linux Driver
46 points
3 hours ago
| 3 comments
| phoronix.com
| HN
NooneAtAll3
49 minutes ago
[-]
Every time I hear about HDMI and amount of legalese problems around it, my response is "you can just use DisplayPort"
reply
tapoxi
19 minutes ago
[-]
Most TVs don't have DisplayPort
reply
cassianoleal
6 minutes ago
[-]
An adaptor costs £7.
reply
tapoxi
2 minutes ago
[-]
For HDMI 2.0. For HDMI 2.1 and 4K/120hz you're looking at north of $25 and don't get VRR support.
reply
amlib
5 minutes ago
[-]
They have limitations, specially when driven to the limits of the specifications.

When doing 4k@120fps 4:4:4 chroma you might have to deal with longer handshakes and sometimes even no handshake at all. Or random dropouts. Or HDR not activating properly.

reply
eliaspro
4 minutes ago
[-]
But wouldn't this break the HDCP chain and therefore render many use-cases (playback of DRM-protected streams) broken?
reply
WithinReason
1 hour ago
[-]
This was previously blocked from inclusion in SteamOS by the HDMI forum. It would help the Steam Machine to each 4K120Hz on HDMI.
reply
paol
1 hour ago
[-]
It was blocked from inclusion in the AMD GPU drivers, it's nothing specific to Steam or the Steam Machine.

The HDMI Forum apparently forbids any open source implementation of HDMI 2.1. Although I don't know if they ever offered an official justification, for a group that exists to promote HDMI adoption, they're clearly morons.

reply
account42
1 hour ago
[-]
It's a group that exists to make sure that the standard works for all the members, including media companies that think they can control the flow of information. They don't need to promote HDMI adoption since their members already control pretty much all the TV production.
reply
Aissen
1 hour ago
[-]
were*

As the article says, they most likely changed their mind, probably following quite a bit of background discussions and industry influence.

reply
expedition32
44 minutes ago
[-]
If memory serves HDMI includes DRM which they don't want people to reverse engineer.
reply
tosti
13 minutes ago
[-]
> 4K @ 240Hz

WHY!?

reply
cassianoleal
5 minutes ago
[-]
Would you rather they explicitly blocked that even though the technology allows for it?
reply