My reaction to the first demo (recipe) is that it was slower than typing the same thing on your keyboard.

The second demo seems to be a wash: there's no time saved in saying "move this" versus "move crab".

The third demo doesn't seem to warrant the use of a pointer at all, since there is only one way to interpret the prompt.

None of this means that this approach will not be successful, but there's a reason why so many attempts to revolutionize user interfaces ended up going nowhere. For example, talking to your computer was always supposed to be the future, but in practice, it's slower and more finicky than typing.

In fact, the only new UI paradigm of the past 28+ years appears to have been touchscreens and swipe gestures on phones. But they are a matter of necessity. No one wants to finger-paint on a desktop screen.

Oh interesting, this is very cool. At first I thought it was just focus-follows-mouse but it's more interesting. You have certain keywords trigger "add to prompt". Ignoring the voice functionality (which is admittedly crucial currently because other inputs currently take over focus), I've often wanted to just have a continuous conversation with the LLM as I 'point and click' (or tab over and select) at various things. Might be neat to have text input focus continue to go to the LLM where I'm typing text etc.

Sometimes I go to a different page to take a screenshot and other times I'm browsing for a file, and other times I'm highlighting some log lines. Cursor did this well, with selecting text in the terminal auto-focusing the Cursor agent textbox so you could talk to the agent and then select some text and you didn't have to re-select the original agent textbox again. The agent is a top-level function in that system not "just another app I have to switch to" to take my context with.

I have some small amount of bias because I've always felt input-constrained on computers. I have to move my hands to go places and that's exasperating. I've tried head tracking, had a vim pedal for a while, and used tiling WMs, and things like this to aid but while my vim-fu is pretty good and I function inside things very well with it, my cross-application interface isn't.

In the end, perhaps we all have our home offices with our Apple Vision Pros and we talk to them like this to maneouvre faster through our machines and get our ideas into them.

Cool research. I wonder what we'll end up with.

My first impression coming away from this is skepticism.

Anything with voice controls for routine use is a pretty tough sell. Doing this when you're not completely alone would be annoying to everyone around you.

Most of their examples seem like they could have been done with a right click drop down menu so they don't really need to "re-invent the mouse pointer".

So is this thing talking to Google's servers all the time for the AI integration? So it won't work if you're not connected to the internet? Privacy concerns are obvious; now Google wants to have an AI watching literally everything you do on your computer?

Does it cost the user anything for the LLM use? If it's free will it stay free forever? That's quite a lot to give away if they're expecting people to use it to change a single word like in one of their examples. I guess they're expecting to make the money back by gathering data about literally everything you do on your computer.

There might be a killer app for AI integration with personal computers that has yet to be invented, but this doesn't look like it.

Next generation of OS should have constant video and audio recognition by on device LLM. This will provide valuable context for a lot of scenarios. So instead of frequent copy-pasting we are used to, we can let agents access context of our whole workflows from different apps.

But Google is a very ill positioned candidate for such OS. I would rather trust Apple and local-first on-device models.

I sense a privacy problem brewing.

It reminds me of Microsoft Recall in the sense that some portion of the screen is going to be continuously transmitted outside of the users control.

What happens when someone browses something very private (planning a surprise engagement. looking at medical data. planning a protest)? All that data gets slurped to google and subject to a warrant or discovery or building your advertising fingerprint.

Maybe the idea is that the data is sent to AI only when you right click, but that seems like a very thin firewall that a product manager will breach in the interests of delivering "predictive AI" via some kind of precomputed results.

Please don't.

I like text selection exactly how it is. I want precise controls.

It's fine for a touch interface like a phone, but on a computer I expect precision. As much as I can get.

The concept is good but accuracy in cluttered environment can be a concern, also misinterpreting context can be a problem

Wiggle at CAPTCHAs, wiggle at Termux, wiggle at Emacs, wiggle at the Godot Editor, wiggle at my remote desktop.

(Not going to happen)

Reminds me of Put That There https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RyBEUyEtxQo

It's beautiful how the human mind can take something very obvious but overlooked and make it into this fantastic innovation. Fab stuff.

Of course, it isn't a Google Demo, if you can't use it to book a table at restaurant. (shown at the bottom of the page)

This seems like one of those things that is usable infrequently enough to be forgotten/poorly developed/never used. (Even before accounting for the actual failure rate of the LLM which will be none-zero).

Perhaps a text box and file upload isn’t the perfect interface for every use case but it is versatile which is a huge barrier to overcome.

Don't build these things, instead build protocols and expose system level APIs for application developers to build things.

so Google will be monitoring whatever on the screen continuously or only when the user say the magic words (this, that, here, there)?

Google needs to beat OpenAI and Antropic in coding models because that's where the big money is going. I love using the Gemini pro model for quick questions, but that's not where I'm spending the real money.

They have so many great software engineers but unable to use them to speed up coding AI research. Hopefully with Sergey's focus it will get better.

This cursor thing is just another experiment nobody cares about.

Interesting! I wonder how UI will evolve in the long-term? If there are browser-use/computer-use and clicky-clones automating pointer actions, do we really need complex UI anymore? If yes, when?

No thanks

It only took Google and their AI offering to come up with Graffiti.

I wonder what sort of monstrous power would be unleashed if Google used Plan9 as a foundation.

Just seven hours ago there was a plea on HN [0] to please not do this. Seriously, what are they smoking at Google right now?

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107027

being able to make precise edits would be huge for AI

Both of the text based demos would have been simpler and faster with traditional mouse and keyboard interactions. What is the AI adding?

There's already a product that does this lol

Aaaaand now I can't remember the name of it

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but what is new about the pointer itself? Seems to be functionally the same as selecting + tooltips / context menus.

do not want

Like a dream come true...

Nightmares are dreams as well and this is a nightmare like Windows Recall.

Technically wonderful though.

> We’ve been exploring new AI-powered capabilities to help the pointer not only understand what it’s pointing at, but also why it matters to the user.

We couldn't quite track you well enough before. So we're fixing that under the guise of "AI powered capabilities."

what the hell is going on at google

Thanks, I hate it