Why does it look like LLMs consistently overestimate implementation time?
3 points
4 hours ago
| 4 comments
| HN
I have my suspicion: they estimate how long people would have taken to implement some feature, becasue they were trained on such data. I consistently see estimates of 2 week/3 weeks or 5 days, etc. But then implementation takes a day or 2 max using agents within Claude/GPT. Unless I am missing something? Anybody else notice this?
vishnukool
14 minutes ago
[-]
The problem is that LLMs do not have a conceptual grounding in actual time. They estimate based on statistical correlation found in their training data which is filled with standard corporate project management timelines legacy codebases and waterfall estimates.
reply
sieve
3 hours ago
[-]
This is very common as they have no conception of time. They are just using ballpark figures based on what they see in the wild. I see estimates for modules in weeks/months when it can produce it in a single afternoon of prompting.
reply
dnnddidiej
2 hours ago
[-]
You ask LLMs for estimates? Interesting.

Probably big model providers should do calibratuons for that and add an estimation skill.

reply
schappim
2 hours ago
[-]
I've found that they declare estimates unprompted.
reply
kspetkov79
3 hours ago
[-]
They tend to turn a small change into the whole cleanup plan. Sometimes that is useful, but it makes estimates too large.
reply