FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
71 points
2 hours ago
| 6 comments
| pcmag.com
| HN
breve
1 minute ago
[-]
Don't worry about it. Kick back and relax with some Kash Patel branded bourbon:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/05/kash-patel-fbi-...

You'll feel better in no time.

reply
analogpixel
2 hours ago
[-]
For people that can't grok the title and the article like me:

- BasedApparel.com is a website owned by a person that happens to be the FBI director now. (he owned it before he became the director if it matters)

- The website BasedApparel.com was hacked and the hackers added a malicious click here to verify you are human section that tried to have you download a malicious payload if you were on macos.

reply
bdcravens
2 hours ago
[-]
> he owned it before he became the director if it matters

All the more reason that those who "serve" in the government should be required to divest of their business interests. The traffic such a site would get due to the tribalism prevalent in US politics makes it a fat target, and potentially a national security threat.

reply
gensym
33 minutes ago
[-]
So it's not where you buy those shirts that say "Female Body Inspector?"
reply
mzajc
1 hour ago
[-]
> if you were on macos

Did they only target macOS? The article mentions macOS a lot, but AFAIK this attack changes the instructions based on the User-Agent. I've seen the exact page with instructions for Windows and PowerShell before.

reply
morkalork
1 hour ago
[-]
>happens to be

This is not normal, other (decent) countries are not like this

reply
newscracker
1 hour ago
[-]
> The attack seems to work by spanning various instructions that if run through macOS’s Terminal utility could steal stored credentials from Chromium-based browsers along with data from cryptocurrency wallets, placing them into a zip archive then sent to a hacker-controlled domain.

What is it about Chromium based browsers that this attack narrows down to? Is it something technical in the ease of stealing information or just the imagined market share by the attackers? As per Cloudflare’s statistics browser share on macOS [1], it seems like Google Chrome users are a little less than two thirds of the total user base. But Safari still holds one third of the user base. Ignoring Safari seems like a poor mistake.

[1]: https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/browser-market-share-20...

reply
NDlurker
2 hours ago
[-]
Thank you Based God
reply
ray_v
2 hours ago
[-]
What next? The trump phone shipping Chinese malware. Unthinkable!
reply
jmward01
2 hours ago
[-]
It wouldn't be Chinese. It would be Russian.
reply
kibwen
1 hour ago
[-]
To paraphrase Hickam's dictum, a phone can have as many sources of malware as it damn well pleases.
reply
Georgelemental
1 hour ago
[-]
Amazes me that, after the events of the past 3 years, so many people still think Russia is the major foreign influence on our politics.
reply
dralley
17 minutes ago
[-]
The existence of other influences does not diminish the fact that Trump is enamored with Putin (and most "strong man" dictators generally, but Putin in particular) and it does impact his foreign policy decisions and those of his administration (Hegseth straight up canceled weapons shipments to Ukraine for 2 weeks in the aftermath of the Oval Office meeting thinking it would please the boss).
reply
wmf
1 hour ago
[-]
Why not both?
reply
dylan604
1 hour ago
[-]
To what point? Do we actually think Trump would use a Trump phone? Otherwise, they'd just be getting data on die hard MAGA types that have nothing to do with anything juicy
reply
BoorishBears
48 minutes ago
[-]
Patel's site was just dropping sauce: overdose of sauce
reply
Group_B
2 hours ago
[-]
And once again, another prime example that we do not live in a serious country
reply
mjmas
2 hours ago
[-]
> The attack suggests a hacker compromised some portion of BasedApparel.com
reply