Letter from the Duke of Wellington to the British Foreign Office (1809)
51 points
8 hours ago
| 7 comments
| wellsoc.org
| HN
Slightly more readable link: https://cns.gatech.edu/CNS/GTaccountProcs.pdf
delichon
5 hours ago
[-]
Likely apocryphal. It isn't in the massive official "Despatches of Field Marshal the Duke of Wellington" and the exaggerated, humorous style is not characteristic.
reply
morsch
5 hours ago
[-]
Thanks, I read through a few pages and found it a more interesting read than the original link.

E.g. here he's complaining to the undersecretary of state:

https://archive.org/details/dispatchesoffiel10welluoft/page/...

Here (and a few lines on the page before) is a long letter with his advice on how to reconstitute the (allied) government of Spain:

https://archive.org/details/dispatchesoffiel10welluoft/page/...

reply
gjm11
2 hours ago
[-]
Also, the letter is allegedly (1) dated 1812 and (2) signed "Wellington". In 1812 he was still plain old Arthur Wellesley; he wasn't duked[1] until 1814.

[1] I am sure this is not actually the right term. I do not care.

reply
zb
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
hn_throw2025
2 hours ago
[-]
Ennobled?
reply
mef
2 hours ago
[-]
Belorded?
reply
cjs_ac
5 hours ago
[-]
Why would Wellington have to answer to the Foreign Office for the administration of the forces under his command when that was the responsibility of the War Office?
reply
ggm
4 hours ago
[-]
Entertaining if fictive. His comments to his army and his own role in the victory are I hope better attested to.
reply
BigTTYGothGF
5 hours ago
[-]
There's no way that's not a joke written many decades or more later.
reply
RobotToaster
6 hours ago
[-]
Technically from Sir Arthur Wellesley, he wasn't made duke until 1814.
reply
TacticalCoder
3 hours ago
[-]
> Tis of no matter your Highness, I have seen their backs before

Don't know whether that's true or not (that the Duke of Wellington said that) but... One year later (1815), he handed the french's arses back to them big, big, big, times at Waterloo.

Basically the battle of Waterloo (a few kilometers away from where I was born) is considered the time when the UK overtook France as the world's number one superpower.

Since then both have only ever been falling in the rankings and it doesn't look like that fall is going to stop anytime soon but that's another topic.

reply
jemmyw
2 hours ago
[-]
> is considered the time when the UK overtook France as the world's number one superpower.

But unlikely a result of said battle, rather the instability of politics in France.

Us British oft think of Waterloo as a great victory, although the circumstances, participants and objectives were pretty nuanced. Wellington himself rejected congratulations and thought battle to have very high cost.

reply
B1FF_PSUVM
2 hours ago
[-]
> superpower

That's an anachronism, from the 19th to mid-20th century there were just "great powers", not perfectly matched but considered to be in the same class. The Ottoman empire falling off the league ("sick old man") was a bit of a shocker.

reply
jhkrug
4 hours ago
[-]
reply