Let's talk about EU Sovereignty (2025)
25 points
1 hour ago
| 6 comments
| musings.martyn.berlin
| HN
petcat
44 minutes ago
[-]
> Yes, the EU “cloud providers” are lagging behind but they’re catching up. Scaleway, Herzner, and others are there, and you should check them out if you’re starting a business in the EU.

I would argue that these aren't even "cloud providers", they are just VPS providers. Which is fine, but it's not the same thing.

There really isn't any European "cloud" service at all, which is a huge part of the problem. And I doubt there ever will be because who would even build it?

It would cost billions and billions of euros just to be "not AWS" (but worse in every way except location). Who is investing in that?

reply
parheric
9 minutes ago
[-]
This…

It’s painful being a non-EU person working here, and hearing people wax lyrical about sovereign EU cloud without an actual product or product plan.

And once a product is anctua shipped and offered it is like already 5 years behind what US clouds are offering.

It’s embarrassing really

reply
tormeh
36 minutes ago
[-]
You cannot possibly with a straight face claim that Scaleway is a VPS provider. Hetzner, sure, but Scaleway offers compute and database services in the same way that AWS does - just fewer.
reply
traceroute66
19 minutes ago
[-]
But why would the Europeans want to copy the US "cloud" model of micro-compartmentalizing services into hundreds of abstracted products carefully designed to have circular dependencies between each other ..... And all shipped with price sheets billed in invented unit metrics and more small-print than a packet of prescription drugs that makes it completely impossible to predict how much you're going to pay.

I'll take the cleaner approach with predictable billing offered by the EU providers. Even if it means using my brain to RTFM and edit a couple of config files (which can then be rolled into automation via images or Ansible or whatever).

reply
maccard
33 minutes ago
[-]
> There really isn't any European "cloud" service at all, which is a huge part of the problem. And I doubt there ever will be because who would even build it?

Lidl! https://horovits.medium.com/lidl-is-taking-on-aws-the-age-of...

reply
mooreds
37 minutes ago
[-]
> Who is investing in that?

Big companies that see the opportunity to be "Not AWS"?

A VPS provider who wants to grow their marketshare?

Nation states?

Not saying it'll be a small effort, but if the US continues to wield national laws to coerce American companies to negatively affect European citizens, it's possible.

reply
yubblegum
35 minutes ago
[-]
> And I doubt there ever will be because who would even build it?

My money would be on the French.

reply
nish__
36 minutes ago
[-]
No. "Cloud" is a marketing term for VPSs.
reply
input_sh
4 minutes ago
[-]
I disagree, "cloud" is extracting basic Linux functions into as many proprietary services as possible because businesses would rather deal with obscure YAML configurations than ever having to touch Linux-proper.
reply
xg15
25 minutes ago
[-]
I feel the article is a bit roundabout, but eventually gets to the point: "Sovereignty" is not (mainly) about physical location, it's about which legal entity controls the data and whether or not that entity is subject to US jurisdiction and could be forced to disclose the data to US companies or agencies, in violation of EU law.
reply
politician
19 minutes ago
[-]
Which is mightily funny because in the opening paragraph the article equates "anti-free movement" with "problematic baggage". It's a problem if people can't move freely in and out of Europe, but not data -- that's our red line!
reply
xg15
17 minutes ago
[-]
I mean... Yes? People and data about people are two different things - as is who is doing the "movement" in the first place.

Would you also support free movement of all the valuables in your bank vault?

reply
CrzyLngPwd
19 minutes ago
[-]
If an EU company refuses to play ball with the US, the US can simply compel the company through sanctions, as it is trying to do with ICC judges.

Travel bans, visa/mastercard, debanking, the whole nine yards.

reply
boredatoms
31 minutes ago
[-]
So when is France/Germany going to subsidize a local competitor, say through anchor customers like their militaries
reply
rirkrkrkfkfkfkf
19 minutes ago
[-]
For start organizations thwt are sponsored by non-SU entities should disclose their conflict of interest!
reply
johndhi
20 minutes ago
[-]
This is such a dumb topic to me - and I work closely to this issue. The blog post talks about criminal surveillance and gag order possibilities - but has no examples of these being meaningfully applied. Eu govt also spies on citizens.

Obviously the true political point is the geopolitical security risk of depending on another country. There's some truth there but really all countries depend on all others and the way to balance it is to use and grow the trading leverage you do have, not trying to shore up your weaknesses.

reply
pacaro
1 minute ago
[-]
The EU's "E-Evidence framework" allows authorities in any member state to compel entities doing business in any part of the EU to produce and/or preserve communications data, completely by-passing cross-border barriers.

_e.g._ Victor Orban could have wiretapped any communication within the EU. Supporter by an EU directive

reply