The placeholder name for the Windows 8 experience was "modern"
36 points
2 days ago
| 15 comments
| devblogs.microsoft.com
| HN
ahmedfromtunis
58 minutes ago
[-]
> The ListView control? It started out with the more tedious name “modern collection control”, which got shortened to “MoCo.”

A missed opportunity to call it "MoCoCo" which, if you ask me, has more flare and personality to it. What a waste :/

reply
Yhippa
40 minutes ago
[-]
Way more fun than JaCoCo (which I actually like): https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/
reply
usermac
1 hour ago
[-]
A bit off-topic but I super enjoyed the UI on the Windows Phones at the time. Only topped by the WebOS from Palm even before it I recall.
reply
ranger207
22 minutes ago
[-]
My first smartphone was a Windows phone with half a gig of RAM and it's still the best phone I've ever owned in terms of software
reply
azinman2
51 seconds ago
[-]
What made it so great?
reply
trollbridge
31 minutes ago
[-]
Yeah. The Windows Phone was an amazing piece of technology. It's a tragedy it did not win at all in the marketplace.

In particular, it was pretty easy to write apps for, unlike the other two big giants.

reply
ryukoposting
33 minutes ago
[-]
One of my high school friends had a Windows phone around this time, the one with the giant camera bit. I thought it looked super cool but he hated the thing. No apps.
reply
tonyrice
1 hour ago
[-]
Same here. I had a window's phone at some point. Would have loved it with a stylus.
reply
cenamus
39 minutes ago
[-]
Did that have any real-world effects/benefits?

I think you could build most Linux desktops with RT enabled, but I don't think you'd gain anything UX related

reply
Yhippa
39 minutes ago
[-]
They had some cool form factors too. I remember I had one of the phones with a landscape slide-out physical keyboard.
reply
whobre
43 minutes ago
[-]
Ditto. Metro was the best graphic UI I ever used. I liked even on the laptop.
reply
copperx
1 hour ago
[-]
And the Windows Phone 7 had a hard realtime kernel!
reply
joe_mamba
58 minutes ago
[-]
Same for me. Windows Phone was super smooth even on budget phones with 1GB/512MB of RAM while Android would have been choppy as hell on such hardware.

Also, the Windows 8 tablet mode had better touch and swipe UX than the current Windows 11 when put in tablet mode. What a joke Microslop has become.

Nadella needs to clean house or step down. The only thing he executed well was the cloud/hyperscaler side of the business because he caught the period when everything was moving to the cloud and MS was well positioned to take advantage of that as big companies were already invested into the on-prem MS ecosystem, but on the consumer facing side he fumbled everything, all consumer products are worse than how they were under Balmer: Windows - trash, Office - trash, Xbox - trash, Bing - trash, Copilot - trash.

reply
trollbridge
30 minutes ago
[-]
It's a major problem. As present trends continue, eventually nobody is going to need any Microsoft products anymore. I'm already watching clients gradually shift away from Office to simple using Google Workspace, and eventualy they'll do the same with Windows.

AWS is the dominant player in cloud hosting. What, exactly, does anyone need Microsoft for anymore?

reply
RattlesnakeJake
29 minutes ago
[-]
I had a Lumia with 512MB of RAM. The OS ran great, but the web outpaced it. I couldn't open a lot of JS-heavy sites without Internet Explorer crashing.
reply
arethuza
1 hour ago
[-]
My name for the Windows 11 experience is "Linux Mint"... ;-)
reply
phreack
56 minutes ago
[-]
I spell it KDE but it might be regional variance (:
reply
LarryDarrell
1 hour ago
[-]
They were so busy trying to create modern that they forgot what made things classic.
reply
akikoo
1 hour ago
[-]
The solution to Windows 8 UI issues was aptly named, Classic Shell
reply
caryme
51 minutes ago
[-]
Can confirm, I worked on MoPho. It was a weird time.
reply
mr_toad
1 hour ago
[-]
I read somewhere that the visual design of Windows 8 was based on the works of Mondrian, because they wanted a design that didn’t just look like the Swiss School that Apple had adopted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Stijl

I don’t know if the idea of calling Windows 8 modern stemmed from that, or if they decided to pick Mondrian having already decided to go with modern.

reply
ux266478
1 hour ago
[-]
Hot take: I liked Windows 8. It used less memory than Windows 7, increased battery life, the file manager and task manager were much improved, I could mount ISOs without third party software, among other things. In truth, I didn't even mind the start screen. And I certainly liked Metro as a UI paradigm much more than Aero.

Of course it was still Windows at the end of the day, but 8.1 was my last Windows. The laptop I ran it on is slowly bitrotting in a storage locker somewhere on the other end of the country. I didn't like the look of Windows 10, several aspects of it were hard dealbreakers, so I never swapped to it. Eventually I just changed over to using Linux as my primary OS and haven't really looked back.

reply
havblue
40 minutes ago
[-]
I was one of the few people that thought people would like it. That is, why shouldn't it be better to have a bunch of tiles on your desktop that have the most important information and then you choose the one you really want to concentrate on full screen? Well, of course the problem is you aren't using a tablet. It's trying to fix something that never needed to be fixed.

But yes, Linux is great now and most people on the site can easily debug potential problems they run into on it and not look back.

reply
trollbridge
33 minutes ago
[-]
It also suffered from a lack of relevant applications. The apps I used were a terminal emulator, a web browser, Word, Excel, Project, and a few other old Win32 type apps - none of which were going to become "modern" apps in any useful way.
reply
trollbridge
34 minutes ago
[-]
I ran Windows 8 and the 8.1 on a Surface Pro 2 for about two years as my daily driver. It was great for travelling with since it was so lightweight and easy to use in cramped airplane seats. However, I never bothered using any of the "modern" applications at all.

Windows 10 was certainly an improvement.

reply
NooneAtAll3
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
bee_rider
1 hour ago
[-]
I sort of like the term “early Modern” in history. Putting the “early modern” period 250 years ago causes us to reflect on how much life has changed over that time, which is useful because it’s so tempting to imagine what life was like during the Renaissance or Middle Ages. Of course, every period has massive change, so the experiences of people on either end of a period are as different as somebody in the early modern and… actual modern… eras!
reply
bikuto77
1 hour ago
[-]
I wonder if they also made a modern system to handle 'hosts'.
reply
sixothree
1 hour ago
[-]
I thought Metro was appropriate. As in, the name fit the design style.
reply
nailer
1 hour ago
[-]
The final name was also called Modern. I know this person worked on Windows 8, but as a member of the public we definitely knew the Windows 8 UI was called 'Modern'.
reply
dismalaf
48 minutes ago
[-]
Honestly, the "modern" UI (Live tiles) was unironically the best part of Windows 8.
reply
excalibur
1 hour ago
[-]
When you put "modern" or "new" into the name of a thing, you're basically announcing to the world that it was designed for the short term, and when it is no longer new it will no longer be relevant.
reply
mr_toad
1 hour ago
[-]
Modern in the art & design world is actually quite retro.
reply
moduspol
1 hour ago
[-]
This is from the same company that brought us Windows NT (New Technology).
reply
embedding-shape
1 hour ago
[-]
Adding "fast" is similarly fun, it's probably true when you came up with it, probably won't be true in the future anymore.
reply
usui
54 minutes ago
[-]
What do you mean? Fast Ethernet is fast, and it'll stay that way forever! It's in the name! 100 Mbit/s!
reply
deburo
44 minutes ago
[-]
Or USB:

- USB 2.0: High-Speed USB

- USB 3.0: Super-Speed USB

The marketing names are often deficient, but at least there's a clear version number attached to it. Microsoft doesn't like version numbers at all.

reply
sfsbebbgbx
1 hour ago
[-]
As is ”simple”.
reply
NopIdoN
1 hour ago
[-]
It doesn't fit now and it won't work later.
reply
nailer
1 hour ago
[-]
No. Modern like 1950's modern. Unadorned, functional.
reply
kgwxd
1 hour ago
[-]
"Modern" = something that ruins perfectly good stuff in the never ending pursuit of "progress". UI doesn't need to change every few years. It should have stopped changing almost 30 years ago.
reply
jan_Sate
1 hour ago
[-]
This. I don't see the point of constantly changing UI as an end-user. The old one just work. It works perfectly. Now that you changed it and thing breaks. :|
reply
mx7zysuj4xew
1 hour ago
[-]
It's still broken to this day
reply
mx7zysuj4xew
1 hour ago
[-]
I wish violence on every one of the people involved for the pain they caused
reply
idicdjicjdjd
52 minutes ago
[-]
You would, wouldn’t you?
reply