Show HN: Uruky (EU-based Kagi alternative) now has Image Search and URL Rewrites
135 points
6 hours ago
| 32 comments
| uruky.com
| HN
You can get a 2h free trial by solving a proof-of-work captcha when topping up your account for the first time.

If you'd like to learn more, an independent interview was posted a couple of weeks ago [1], and the FAQ [2] has a lot of information as well.

For the source code sharing, we've talked with lawyers and are inclined to no longer require the NDA/NCC for privacy reasons shared with us before (signing requires identification), but instead use a source-available permissive license that doesn't allow competition, like PolyForm Shield [3] (we do still have about 6 months before finalising a decision, here).

This does come with a lot more risks for us (it's harder to track down if someone publishes the code or uses it against the license), but given we've already passed 100 monthly active accounts, we're feeling more confident it's an acceptable risk.

The plan is to give logged in accounts (who are 12 months old or more) a way to download a ZIP of the current code base that's in the server.

Obviously there's no easy way to prove that's the case, but we're open to ideas/suggestions if someone here has them.

[1]: https://theprivacydad.com/interview-with-the-engineer-of-uru...

[2]: https://uruky.com/faq

[3]: https://polyformproject.org/licenses/shield/1.0.0

evilmonkey19
4 hours ago
[-]
I really like the idea and that it's eu-made a love it. A fee things I see with kagi which are useful and improvements:

- Hire a UI/UX person NOW! My parents and gf like using google and kagi because are easy to use.

- add the widgets like the football or the show the local store with the phone number asap. My gf is thinking about moving away from kagi because of this.

- the quick ai response is extremely useful.

- Indexing websites is super important. People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible. Many times i use google due to this fact.

- Make a family subscription.

- make it funny, easy to use and welcoming. The branding is SUPER important.

Good luck and I really wish you to succeed! Im paying for an account ;)

reply
embedding-shape
4 hours ago
[-]
> Uruky is a private search engine focused on personalization

> - Indexing websites is super important. People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible. Many times i use google due to this fact.

Is there a way to build a search engine that doesn't involve either building or accessing a index somehow? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, is this for the website builders or for the users, who the "indexing of websites" is super important? The "people doesn't know" part sounds like it's for website authors, but the last part makes it sound like the context is search engine users.

reply
evilmonkey19
1 hour ago
[-]
I refer to the fact that many websites don't have a proper way to search the content inside the website. For instance, many goverment websites have terrible accessibility and the data seems ofuscated.

Google solves me to search content in those websites

reply
Infiniti20
3 hours ago
[-]
In the FAQ, they mention they don’t have an index, they just collect the results from other search engines.
reply
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
[-]
Ok, so say they added their own website index then, how would that help with "People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible"?
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Uh oh. Where is that? We do have our own index, Uruky Site Search!
reply
tazard
2 hours ago
[-]
On the settings page it appears that the index is disabled by default and not included in the ordering either. It's a bit confusing here!
reply
BrunoBernardino
1 hour ago
[-]
It’s currently a tiny “indieweb” index, which is why it’s opt-in right now, and not big enough to be in the ordering, yet.
reply
KomoD
2 hours ago
[-]
How do I search the index? How big is it?

I went into settings, excluded every provider, and enabled "include uruky site search", but it still says "Providers used: Mojeek", and every other search I try shows no mention of the uruky index

reply
BrunoBernardino
1 hour ago
[-]
It’s too small right now, so we don’t allow you to search it exclusively, yet. Eventually it should become a “proper” search provider once it reaches 100M urls or so.
reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
Thank you for your suggestions and support!

- Ouch. We get a lot of love for our UI/UX, which I guess just goes to show taste is personal. If you have any particular points of friction, we'd love to hear about them.

- Only Serper allows for this, so we're very hesitant. If other providers allowed it, we could definitely consider it.

- We won't have Generative AI, sorry.

- Could you clarify?

- Check out the interview I gave The Privacy Dad, I explain the problems for something like that.

- Roger!

reply
evilmonkey19
1 hour ago
[-]
- the landing page looks good to me, but not to my mother for example. A slight difference in color, placing or anything is like a huge problem for her. - im sorry to hear thag. However this is being a deal breaker for my parents and gf :/ they use it A LOT! - many websites have terrible content placing and search features. But im forced to use them. I use google to get to that content.
reply
lowdude
3 hours ago
[-]
Seeing the point on UI/UX got me curious as well and from a brief look I don't quite see where it is coming from, but maybe they will expand on it. Regarding their point about relatives loving Google/Kagi for usability: If you don't already do that, I believe it can be pretty eye-opening to just place some "tech-illiterate" person in front of your product and check if/where they struggle. There were lots of situations where I saw people struggling with steps I stopped thinking about, just because I was more familiar with the software. And while I have nothing to do with UI/UX myself, I am pretty sure that kind of paper cut is what tends to block any kind of broad adoption.
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thanks! Your point is quite valid and we do that. Unfortunately, the biggest problem with most "tech-illiterate" people we have is that they don't understand why they should care about privacy or what's "wrong" with AI tools in the first place.
reply
evilmonkey19
1 hour ago
[-]
I got the point. But in this case, you have a fairly low pricing (5€), therefore i guess either you want a side project, a small business in a familiar kind or to go worldwide adoption. The last case, you have to take "tech illiterate" people really seriously.
reply
wolvoleo
4 hours ago
[-]
Big plus for not doing unrequested AI stuff <3
reply
axegon_
4 hours ago
[-]
I'd be more than willing to subscribe and support the project BUT, I need to address the elephant in the room: The reason why I'm against Kagi is the fact that they use Yandex(be it only for images according to their own words) and I'm sure as hell refusing to give a single cent to them. So I guess my question is: sources?
reply
SockThief
3 hours ago
[-]
> For web search, Uruky currently integrates Mojeek, Marginalia, EUSP (Ecosia/Qwant) (only works with French, German, or English), Linkup, Serper, and Uruky Site Search.

> For image search, Uruky currently integrates Pixabay and Serper (image results).

https://uruky.com/faq

reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thank you!
reply
specproc
3 hours ago
[-]
What's wrong with Yandex? I think every possible criticism of Yandex I can think of could just as easily be leveled at Google or Bing.
reply
NicuCalcea
2 hours ago
[-]
I also don't use Kagi because of Yandex, and my reason is that it's a Russian company, owned by people close to the Russian government.
reply
graemep
2 hours ago
[-]
Kagi seems unfairly picked on here. Lots of people do business with Russia. Multiple EU countries import gas from Russia which, the UK just dropped sanctions on Russian oil, lots of countries do not have sanctions on Russia at all so buying things from those countries might involve money ending up going to Russia.

On the other hand Kagi is an American company so is at the very least abiding by US sanctions.

reply
NicuCalcea
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm not claiming it's an infallible system and that no single cent of my money goes to Russia. I just do what's within my powers based on the information I have.
reply
graemep
1 hour ago
[-]
You cannot have an infallible system, but my point is that Kagi keeps getting highlighted, but no-one else seems to.
reply
NicuCalcea
1 hour ago
[-]
In my circles, Europe's (continuing) dependency on Russian fossil fuels is discussed often and at length. This being a tech forum, it's to be expected that conversations would revolve around tech products like Kagi. Off the top of my head, Russian connections are also brought up in relation to OnlyOffice and Telegram.

But I agree, we should be more vigilant about who and what our money supports.

reply
tardedmeme
23 minutes ago
[-]
Is that better or worse than Google?
reply
specproc
2 hours ago
[-]
I loathe both Russian and American governments, what's a boy to do?
reply
NicuCalcea
2 hours ago
[-]
That is a tough position, I don't have a definitive answer. Perhaps you could look at supporting non-US and non-Russian companies building their own search indexes? Not sure what the state of Ecosia and Qwant's European Search Perspective is these days, but that's an option.
reply
_diyar
3 hours ago
[-]
but surely you realize that people going to kagi also don’t like google or bing.
reply
carlosjobim
20 minutes ago
[-]
There's little future in catering to customers who come to you only because they hate Google. They will soon find a reason to hate you and fill up your support forums and Discord with complaints. After all, they are spending the gigantic amount of $10 per month on your service, and have a right to influence the company.

With Uruky, these customers can now move on instead, and the lower price will serve as another reason. And then they also don't have to worry anymore that their accountant is going to call at 3AM and demand that they "justify" the gigantic subscription cost.

And Kagi can focus on the only real selling point they have: Search results quality. Which is where their future lies and what most potential customers are looking to pay for. Not being anti-Google.

reply
sevg
3 hours ago
[-]
But is Yandex government owned? What about Russians abroad that send money back home to their families, and a percentage of that ends up going via taxes to Putin? Are we boycotting all Russians everywhere globally?
reply
distances
1 hour ago
[-]
All businesses based in Russia should be boycotted, also second-hand (so businesses that deal with other businesses based in Russia).

If I knew someone was sending money to Russia, I would of course avoid any contact (let alone financial ties) with them.

reply
tumdum_
3 hours ago
[-]
Yes, we boycott anyone who supports Putin’s regime.
reply
sevg
3 hours ago
[-]
Hate to break it to you, but not all Russians support Putin.
reply
notpushkin
2 hours ago
[-]
I think the OP’s point still stands, but it is a fairly weak argument.

I am Russian and I do oppose Putin’s regime. My family is in Russia, though. If I send them money (which), and they pay for, say, groceries, which are taxed, some tiny part of my money will be used to fund the regime and the war. I am very disappointed but there is no way for me to just yank all my family and friends and relocate them to a less fucked-up jurisdiction.

Doing business with Yandex is a whole other beast. Kagi can choose to use a worse search engine API which doesn’t involve paying money to a Russian company. Are there some market forces at hand here? Maybe a lot of Russian expats pay for Kagi because it has good Russian-language results? I don’t know.

Edit:

> But is Yandex government owned?

It isn’t, but I really doubt it has no ties with it. It would be interesting to trace and see if Yandex Cloud’s international branch money gets back to its Russian counterpart, or if they are two separate things.

reply
psychoslave
3 hours ago
[-]
What's wrong with Yandex? Is it quality of service being too low? Does the company have tracking records of shady practices, worst than what GAFAM are doing that make customer flee away?
reply
SyneRyder
3 hours ago
[-]
In my experience, Yandex was feeding in a lot of low quality results into Kagi - lots of pirated software, shady websites, proxy duplicate copycat sites, content that I'll euphemistically call "free speech". Kagi has a domain blacklist feature, but I was starting to fill up my blocklist - I think it's capped at 1000 domains, and many of these sites spin up new domains specifically to get around blocklists.

There's also the geopolitical issues, which I'll skip over because similar concerns can be leveled at other indexes too. I posted about that on the Kagi feedback forums back in 2024:

https://kagifeedback.org/d/4727-option-to-choose-or-exclude-...

I since built my own metasearch engine for my own use, where I choose the external indexes used, and I'm much happier. I started building a personal index of the web as well. I haven't used Kagi or Google for over a year now.

I hope I'm not distracting from Bruno's Uruky project here. Not everyone is technical enough to spin up some PHP code and make their own metasearch, or spin up a VPS and install a SearxNG instance. There's value in providing a good user experience for less technical users, in building resilience by using multiple indexes & building your own, and reducing dependencies on external index APIs that may cut off your access (coffgooglebingcoff). I'm glad services like Uruky exist.

reply
wolvoleo
3 hours ago
[-]
It's Russian. Indirectly you are supporting Putin when you use it. Those sanctions aren't for no reason.
reply
chadgpt3
3 hours ago
[-]
Am I indirectly supporting Trump when I use DuckDuckGo?
reply
dodslaser
2 hours ago
[-]
Yes, and a lot of EU citizens/companies are actively in the process of migrating away from US based software/products to EU alternatives for, among others, this exact reason.
reply
woadwarrior01
2 hours ago
[-]
Yes. You're also supporting Bing ads. With a thin veneer of privacy washing goodness, of course.
reply
carlosjobim
9 minutes ago
[-]
I'll give you an introduction to Modern European Ethics™:

If you do something in this world and this life - remember you normally have about 70 years - there is always some detail of what you're doing that is worthy of criticism, shunning, and shaming. Since everything in the world is connected, you can't avoid it.

If however you do nothing in your life or with your life, then there is also nothing which you can be criticized for doing. And you can never be criticized for not doing something. When you die after a life toting the line and having the allowed opinion on every subject and shunning people who do things; then you go to European heaven - which is an eternity of committee meetings in Brüssels.

reply
axegon_
3 hours ago
[-]
^ Correct!
reply
yegle
23 minutes ago
[-]
Given that:

- Google has been around for 20+ years, so the concept of search engine and the technologies behind it should have been well known.

- Computing power and Internet speed has increased significantly and in many homes (at least outside of US) 1Gbps is norm.

- Everyone is talking about Google deteriorating over the years and prefer the old Google. The old system from the 2000s should be dirt cheap to run with modern home hardware.

- People's need for search engine is highly specific, you presumably would be interested in searching a small subset of the whole Internet.

My question is: why haven't a local run search engine be a thing at least in the tech circles?

It should be able to bootstrap with e.g. an hourly updated "top 100 websites in 50 categories" index file, and adapt to my daily queries to automatically update the index in the background, and iteratively improves the quality of the results.

The rise of the local LLM users proves this model works.

reply
BrunoBernardino
14 minutes ago
[-]
You should check out hister.org!
reply
yegle
7 minutes ago
[-]
Oh it checked multiple boxes I have in mind, and the website UI is really great. I'll definitely give it a try.
reply
randomtoast
13 minutes ago
[-]
kagi exists for quite some time
reply
yegle
10 minutes ago
[-]
I was talking about a self-hosted search engine.
reply
alex7o
4 hours ago
[-]
I live in the EU and I use kagi, but I think you fail to understand why kagi is good and useful. In the end of the day I need a search engine to find stuff and kagi is better than google for the things I and my AI agents are searching for. If you don't get that no amount of better privacy is worth my time as a person as shit searches mean agents don't works so well a.k.a more expensive or my room becomes toastier for the agents that I run locally. (I can use it for boring personal searches, but I do 2/3 of these a day, so I am not paying 5€ for that)
reply
NoboruWataya
3 hours ago
[-]
Have you tried Uruky and found it to be lacking? Totally agree with you, but I don't see many people here saying they've had a bad experience with this. (I haven't used it)
reply
scrollaway
4 hours ago
[-]
Agreed. The noise in tech circles often gets founders to conflate ten different things into a product that no longer makes sense. “Eu made alternative to Kagi”? Cool, we need European search engines, sign me up. “Privacy is such a priority we’re looking to accept cash by mail”? Okay, you’re never gonna build a serious competitor, never mind.
reply
wolvoleo
4 hours ago
[-]
Yeah Mullvad that accept cash in the post are not a serious VPN provider at all, right.
reply
Havoc
54 minutes ago
[-]
Nice - I like this. Especially that I can also use it via API too and that expectations are limits are set out clearly (which seem very generous).

On limits - consider changing the short limit on this:

> searches to 1 per second, 30 per minute, and 1800 per hour.

to 5 per 5 seconds or 10/10. That still works out to one per second but users are less likely to accidentally hit it with two requests that have similar timing. Say one from me and one from API usage.

reply
BrunoBernardino
47 minutes ago
[-]
Good point. We have never had any reports of customers legitimately hitting these, but we can probably loosen them up a bit.
reply
Havoc
33 minutes ago
[-]
Yeah can't picture the average user getting anywhere near the 2nd and 3rd limit. They seem very high to me, but the short one I can definitely picture hitting easily under API scenarios.

e.g. Suppose you have 3 subagents getting triggered that all want to do a search.

>can probably loosen them up a bit.

Definitely wouldn't move the top 2. That would just be hard to walk back later

reply
sthix
3 hours ago
[-]
Regarding UI/UX. One thing that immediately catches my as an Design Engineer (being over 7 years Product Designer before that) is that the site looks bland. Nothing that sticks. Also one UX caveat: you are using your accent-color for primary buttons like the sign-up as well as a display variant for text for the "PRIVATE SEARCH YOU CONTROL". The logo is not a strong one, lacks personality, the font choice is also a little "weird".

Just my two cents. But I am glad, that someone is creating an alternative in the EU. Hit me up, if you want to get more design opinions.

reply
ent
12 minutes ago
[-]
Please don't try to machine translate to my local language. The translations are terrible or outright incorrect.
reply
dethos
1 hour ago
[-]
Interesting. I will definitely add it to my list of services to experiment with.

I like the account/payment system, where you top up a random account number for a period. Instead of having to go with the whole process of creating and verifying an account with your data and then managing yet another recurring subscription.

Congrats on the release, wish you the best.

reply
BrunoBernardino
1 hour ago
[-]
Thank you! Please reach out if you have any suggestions or run into any trouble!
reply
aniviacat
5 hours ago
[-]
> EU search providers (Marginalia, Mojeek, EUSP, etc.).

Does this mean this is just a meta search engine without its own index?

If so, the comparison to Kagi seems misleading.

The question would turn from "why not Kagi" to "why not SearxNG".

reply
SyneRyder
4 hours ago
[-]
Kagi is also a meta search engine. The only Kagi-owned index is Teclis, which is very small and really only indexes RSS feeds of small sites. The Kagi API supplements its Teclis results with additional results from Marginalia.

It would be nice to have more search indexes available though, especially via APIs.

I wish Kagi was a search index, back when I was a Kagi subscriber that's what I hoped my funds were going towards building.

reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
Good question! We also have Uruky Site Search, our own index, which is quite tiny at the moment, but we hope to grow, eventually. Kagi's own index is Teclis, which is one of their smaller providers as well.
reply
SyneRyder
4 hours ago
[-]
If you are building out your own index, might you consider offering it as an API via pre-paid credits (ala Mojeek, Kagi Teclis?)

I'm only paying Mojeek about $10 - $20 per year in API for my personal metasearch, so I guess this is a terrible market to enter ;) But I'd genuinely be interested, especially if the money is going towards building an index.

reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Uruky does exactly that (it has an API and any searches fund the search providers directly). If you want to _exclusively_ use Uruky Site Search (our index), though, that'd be impossible as it's too small to be used as an exclusive provider. Probably in the future that'll be possible, though.

I'd recommend you look into any of our other search providers if you just want the API search!

reply
aniviacat
4 hours ago
[-]
Sounds good, thanks for the clarification.
reply
freehorse
4 hours ago
[-]
Kagi is also a metasearch engine, as it combines several third-party indexes.
reply
asciimoo
4 hours ago
[-]
As a search/metasearch developer, I can heavily recommend Uruky. It is by far the best third party search alternative in terms of how they approach privacy and transparency. Keep up the good work Bruno! <3
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thank you so much, Adam! Hister [1] is also an amazing option for people looking to have their own "local" index! And it's FOSS!

[1] : https://hister.org

reply
KomoD
3 hours ago
[-]
> EU servers, EU storage, EU payment processing, EU search providers (Marginalia, Mojeek, EUSP, etc.).

> All servers and data are physically in the EU. All search providers are based in the EU. Payment processing is done in the EU.

Mojeek and Serper aren't EU so that's just false. And I'm not sure all the providers only use EU servers so I don't like the claim for that reason too.

> Try in: Google // DuckDuckGo // Ecosia

I would remove this, I thought it was for changing what provider I was using, but no, it just sent me to Google.

Then at the bottom of the page is where I found this, which I would prefer to have at the top.

> Try with: Mojeek // EUSP // Linkup // Serper

reply
BrunoBernardino
42 minutes ago
[-]
Dang. You’re right that Mojeek is UK, so Europe but not EU (at the moment, at least). I’ll need to add a remark for that. We already do it for Serper.

Regarding the servers, our servers and data are in the EU. We can’t guarantee that for our providers, but they don’t access your data.

As for Try in/Try with, good point, we can add a preference for swapping them.

reply
my_throwaway23
4 hours ago
[-]
As much as I'd prefer a smaller, non-american operator (for most anything really), I'm extremely hesitant to pay directly for search.

For this service, the "just an ID as account" looks nice and private on the surface, but once you look at payment methods, it's 100% personally identifiable. If it's so privacy-focused - where's the payment option for transferring Monero?

As for the code - don't get me started. Source available? NDAs?

Smells "Private VPN" funny to me.

reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
We're working towards accepting cash by mail in a month or two, and regarding cryptocurrencies, we've been trying to reach out to proxysto.re unsuccessfully for that. If you know of a similar option, we'd love to hear about it!
reply
sijow
1 hour ago
[-]
Taler could be a good match: it's a digital coin that has been in development for a long time and is currently starting to see real use. It guarantees the anonymity of the buyer but not the merchant (to avoid tax evasion and money laundering). It's not a cryptocurrency (no blockchain, no intrinsic value with floating rate), it's really a digital form of whatever currency your exchange uses.

Now the only working exchange I know is in Switzerland (https://taler-ops.ch/en/). I wonder if you could legally use that from another country... I think GLS Bank is also supposed to have an exchange running in Germany some time this year but there have been delays in the past. Anyway it's probably still a bit early but it could be something to consider.

reply
embedding-shape
4 hours ago
[-]
If the goal truly is privacy, and that's why you're adding cryptocurrency options, then adding a middleman like "proxysto.re" or any other, then you're not giving users the privacy you say you want to give. You really need to handle that on your end, if that's something you want to offer for the purpose of privacy.

Take a look at how Mullvad implemented it, which I guess is where you got the "cash in a letter" method from, they also handle cryptocurrencies by themselves for exactly this reason, there is no way for you to actually be able to fulfill the privacy promise otherwise.

reply
BrunoBernardino
1 hour ago
[-]
Yes, and I’ve talked with Mullvad about it before. The main problem for us is that we cannot exchange XMR for fiat legally, in Portugal, and we have no costs that can be paid with XMR, at the moment.

ProxyStore should work well as a proxy because they receive XMR anonymously and pay us in EUR for an account number. We don’t know who paid for what and don’t care (we also don’t know that after 14 days, Mollie doesn’t know any account number).

reply
RandomGerm4n
3 hours ago
[-]
Privacy Pass would also be a good option. You can use it with Kagi, where you’ll have cryptographic tokens that you can use for searches without them being linked to your account. Even if you use a non-anonymous payment method, you could still use the service without leaving a trace.
reply
wolvoleo
4 hours ago
[-]
I have to agree with embedding-shape, don't use a middleman please. Just accept monero payments yourself <3

Once you accept Monero I'll give it a try :)

reply
ainiriand
5 hours ago
[-]
It is a bit hard to evaluate the potential when you need to top up and do a captcha just for evaluation purposes. The barrier of entry is quite high.
reply
BrunoBernardino
5 hours ago
[-]
To be clear, you don't need to top up (only click the link or try a search) _and_ do the captcha. You can _either_ top up for a month, _or_ do the proof-of-work captcha (should just be clicking a checkbox and giving it a few seconds).

The reason for the higher barrier of entry is bots/abuse. Up until a few weeks ago we didn't even have the captcha option. Without any kind of identification, it's impossible to prevent automated/bot signups, and they can abuse the system to oblivion.

I understand that's not ideal, though I hope it still makes sense!

reply
aniviacat
4 hours ago
[-]
You may want to clarify that in your FAQ, which states this in the very first entry:

> Unfortunately, due to the fact it's too costly to properly avoid bots and other automated tools from abusing our service, we don't offer a free trial.

reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
Argh, stale docs! Thanks for the notice, I'll push that fix in the next update later today (currently in the middle of adding an optional date filter).
reply
iLoveOncall
5 hours ago
[-]
I'm not making a freaking account before I can even run a single search.
reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
To create an account you only need to click a link (so the account number can be randomly generated for you), not provide any information. I understand if that's not good enough for you, though.
reply
Munksgaard
4 hours ago
[-]
As far as I can tell, Kagi also requires you to create an account before you can try it out. You can of course disagree with that practice, but it is not like Uruky is requiring something far out of the ordinary.
reply
mrngld
3 hours ago
[-]
Honestly didn't notice Kagi was US-domiciled. Their meetups I think are typically in Europe and their co-working and office space is in Belgrade.

Anyway, Kagi's excellent, their search results for me are significantly better than Google (and customizable), they've leveraged AI in a way thats optional and, to me, class-leading in its ability to help with search. "But we're EU based" is a product strategy that might land you some local government contracts and a few customers whose key motivation is negative emotion towards others but it's never going to be the path to great success. Spotify didn't conquer the globe because they framed themselves as an anti-US anti-iMusic or anti-Pandora or whatever alternative. They conquered because their product was solid. Nobody cared where it's HQ was.

reply
NoboruWataya
2 hours ago
[-]
It seems clear to me that a company that pushes being EU-based and minimising US dependencies as a selling point doesn't really want to "conquer the globe". As a consumer it is even less important to me. Indeed, if your search provider has conquered the globe, then it's probably time to find a new one because the next logical step is turn the screws on users to maximise profits.
reply
BrunoBernardino
1 hour ago
[-]
Great point! In our comparison page with Kagi it should become clearer that’s not our only product differentiator. If you’re happy with Kagi, that’s great, it’s a very good product! We don’t want world domination. :)
reply
Munksgaard
5 hours ago
[-]
Interesting! All the license stuff aside, there's definitely a desire for more EU-first services like this.
reply
sarjann
3 hours ago
[-]
I think it could help to maybe allow 10 searches free (without logging in) just for someone to see what the UI is like or show an example of the results page. It adds a bit of friction for someone to have to make an account and pay just to test the product.

Kagi lets you test it offline (go incognito and try) " Kagi Search is funded by members, not advertisers: built to find what you need, not sell your attention.

Try 50 free searches, and if you love it, sign up for 100 more before choosing a plan. Searches used "

reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thanks for the suggestion! That would mean we'd have to count searches, which we don't want to do. With the 2h free trial via proof-of-work captcha it should allow you for much more than that! I know the FAQ for that is outdated! I'll update it later today with a new date filter.
reply
Hackbraten
2 hours ago
[-]
Have you considered adding Google’s SERP to your indexes (via some third-party provider)?

Google’s index is by far the largest, and my impression is that a search engine is hardly useful unless it includes Google’s results.

reply
BrunoBernardino
1 hour ago
[-]
Thanks! Serper is UK-based and does that. We provide them as an option, but not by default.
reply
janandonly
4 hours ago
[-]
I read in your FAQ that you don't support bitcoin payments yet. Might I suggest you have a look at https://www.lightspark.com/capabilities/embedded-finance ?

They make it easy to be compliant with local laws and integrate payment features.

reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thanks! We're currently trying to get in touch with proxysto.re for that. Light Spark seems based in the US, so we can't consider them, I'm afraid.
reply
chadgpt3
3 hours ago
[-]
Why do you need to involve a third party to implement bitcoin payments?
reply
BrunoBernardino
39 minutes ago
[-]
Not for bitcoin, but for monero, which is more requested than bitcoin.
reply
bigblind
4 hours ago
[-]
It doesn't do great on recent events it seems. The amusement park Walibi Belgium recently announced a company called RMC is doing a makeover of their wooden roller coaster, so I did a search for "walibi belgium rmc", and it found one very out-of-date article about earlier rumours, and a bunch of less relevant stuff.
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thanks! I'm currently in the middle of building a date filter I expect to launch later today.

Still, was this using Mojeek or EUSP? Have you tried Linkup or Serper for those kinds of searches? You don't have to change your default search providers, you can just choose one from the bottom of the results list.

reply
lolc
42 minutes ago
[-]
Wait do I have to choose what search provider I use for every search? They don't get merged by Uruky?
reply
BrunoBernardino
37 minutes ago
[-]
Only if they don’t provide enough results. We initially queried them all and merged, but that became too costly and inefficient (too many duplicates most times). It should be explained in the FAQ.
reply
danielrmay
5 hours ago
[-]
Does Uruky provide an API, or allow API usage such a way that I can leverage it as part of an agent workflow, or otherwise, in place of something like DuckDuckGo?
reply
amarcheschi
5 hours ago
[-]
There should be according to their faq https://uruky.com/faq
reply
BrunoBernardino
5 hours ago
[-]
Yes, we do offer an API and are transparent about the rate limits (no search limits) in the FAQ.
reply
danielspace23
4 hours ago
[-]
I think that, more than EU metasearch engines, we need EU search indexes. EUSP is already something, but they seem to be working rather slowly, compared to how quickly Brave built their own index.

It's also trivial to run a perfectly working metasearch engine with the same sources as Uruky, it's called Searxng.

In any case, good luck on this project. I personally don't think it's for me. Maybe a better user interface would change the equation, but as of now I'll stick to Qwant.

reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
Yes! Uruky Site Search is our own EU-based index and we'd love to expand it, but that takes an enormous amount of resources (which we don't yet have).

Besides EUSP we also allow you to choose and use Mojeek and Marginalia, two other big EU-based indexes, and by using Uruky with them, you're supporting them financially, directly.

reply
carlosjobim
4 hours ago
[-]
Suggested name: Memory hole.
reply
s_dev
2 hours ago
[-]
Does Uruky pay Yandex like Kagi does?

It's relevant to those of us boycotting Russian products and influence due to the Ukraine war.

reply
BrunoBernardino
2 hours ago
[-]
The search providers we use are listed in our FAQ and all are Europe-based. Yandex is not included.
reply
blfr
1 hour ago
[-]
Can I (and how to) use it as a search engine for Open WebUI?
reply
Alex_toani
3 hours ago
[-]
It's a cool search engine. I agreee that need improve in UI/UX. If UI/UX is great. I will consider to use it.
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thanks, if you have any specific points of friction, please let us know (an email is perfectly fine)!
reply
AndroTux
1 hour ago
[-]
Okay, so in order to do a test search, I have to:

1) type in a query and hit enter because there's no search button.

2) click signup, even though I want to evaluate it before creating an account.

3) apparently now I'm signed up without having to enter any details - what's the point? Just create a new session as soon as I initiate the search.

4) so now I need to return to the homepage to trigger another search.

5) search again, enter again. Now I'm greeted by a captcha.

6) after solving the captcha, I now have to enter my search query a third time because it wasn't saved

7) search results!

Guys.

reply
Kudos
3 hours ago
[-]
Country filters for Luxembourg and Monaco, no country filter for Ireland?
reply
wolvoleo
4 hours ago
[-]
Interesting. Being EU-based is a huge plus over Kagi in my opinion.

I also like that they don't ask any personal data, even email address. I like services that don't want any personal details. Like with Mullvad, where they just give you a random number and that's your account ID <3 Unfortunately Mullvad enshittified in other ways so I had to move to ProtonVPN. But services that act like that are great IMO. Unfortunately a lot of services apply "Know your Customer" BS even though they are not in the financial sector.

However I wonder where they get their search data from. But it's worth investigating.

reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
It should be clear in the FAQ. All Europe-based. Our current search providers:

- Mojeek - EUSP - Marginalia - Linkup - Serper (the only non-EU, being UK and proxying Google) - Uruky Site Search (our own index) - Pixabay (images)

I'd be curious to hear about your Mullvad experience (feel free to email me).

reply
wolvoleo
3 hours ago
[-]
Well Mullvad stopped providing port forwarding, which is necessary for good torrent support (especially if you use public torrents and you need ones that aren't seeded a lot).

They also stopped supporting openvpn which I need. Wireguard only now.

It's not enshittification in terms of ads etc but it is reduction of possibilities because they already make enough money on the people using the main features.

But anyway I rely on both things so I moved over.

reply
KomoD
3 hours ago
[-]
What's the reason you need OpenVPN?
reply
dizhn
3 hours ago
[-]
Do you have Privacy Pass or some other type of privacy-preserving credentials functinoality?
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Can you expand on the benefits of that when there is no personal information (not even an email or payment ID after 14 days) associated with an account?
reply
cromka
4 hours ago
[-]
I hate to say this, but those recent EU alternative counteroffers for popular products bare some really unfortunate names....
reply
BrunoBernardino
4 hours ago
[-]
From our FAQ:

> The name has no special meaning but we read it like "Euro-key" in English. Names are hard, and we're aware it can remind people of Uruk and Uruk-hai. That's OK.

I completely understand your point, though. It's not "Google"!

reply
_ache_
3 hours ago
[-]
"Google", for french speaking people, looks like "Gogol" which means "stupid" or "retarded".
reply
carlosjobim
4 hours ago
[-]
I think this is excellent so that Kagi can focus on making the best search engine instead of trying to please the angriest and most difficult customers.
reply
Cider9986
4 hours ago
[-]
I will pay for search once Kagi or Brave accepts Monero and offers a reasonable price. Can I pay for Uruky with Monero? If you're worried about regulations consider reaching out to proxysto.re
reply
BrunoBernardino
3 hours ago
[-]
Thanks! I have reached out over a week ago to them via email and Signal, to crickets. Let me know if you know why or how to reach them, or alternatives.
reply
localhoster
2 hours ago
[-]
Yavos - Yet Another Vibe-cOded Service :)
reply