Looking Forward to Postgres 19: Query Hints
71 points
3 days ago
| 6 comments
| pgedge.com
| HN
lfittl
3 hours ago
[-]
Its also worth reading the original post by Robert Haas (the author of pg_plan_advice) on motivation/design: https://rhaas.blogspot.com/2026/03/pgplanadvice-plan-stabili...

Also, I'll add my perspective: I think "EXPLAIN (PLAN_ADVICE)" is a key piece to making this a plan stability feature, not (just) a hinting feature. The extensibility/framework pg_plan_advice adds is a foundation, that over time will over time address the age-old "Postgres doesn't have hints" problem, even if the initial release doesn't check all the boxes yet, e.g. no way to use advice for adjusting row/join estimates.

To give an example on extensibility: Some people that I've spoken to are asking "but why is it not a comment-style hint". There are reasons why Postgres didn't go that way for this release (comment parsing in core is non-existent today, and comments don't work correctly e.g. for functions), but its easy to write an extension that sets up an advisor hook to parse comments: https://github.com/pganalyze/pg_advice_comment

reply
aeontech
7 minutes ago
[-]
Very interesting - I just installed pg_hint_plan [0] extension a few months ago to get around a query that was confusing the planner too much. Edge case, but when you need it you really need it.

Haven't seen pg_plan_advice before, TIL!

reply
trollbridge
44 minutes ago
[-]
Shudder. Flashbacks to having to write optimiser hints in Oracle (and the resulting fun times when you'd upgrade the database, something would change, and your hints would make a query slower).
reply
jeffbee
2 minutes ago
[-]
I can't believe we're still doing this. You should be able to dictate the query execution without involving a planner.
reply
crimsonnoodle58
3 hours ago
[-]
> How many of us have toggled enable_seqscan to off to force an index scan? Or thrown an OFFSET 0 into a subquery to prevent the planner from flattening it?

enable_nestloop = off here.

For us, joining many complex views quickly trips the planner up, so I'm really glad to see this.

> They break on upgrades.

The irony is so does the planner. I've seen queries working perfectly fine in older PG's suddenly run away in newer versions. So hints will actually bring stability.

reply
da_chicken
1 hour ago
[-]
The planner breaking on updates is common for almost all RDBMSs. They introduce optimizations that work great for 95% of customers, and some will just have queries that now act like cardinality is way off or covering indexes are missing.
reply
robertlagrant
3 hours ago
[-]
I'm not an expert in database hints, but the syntax looks very readable and composable. That's great thing to have got right.
reply
jbellis
2 hours ago
[-]
man, Tom Lane has hated query hints for literally decades

did he finally come around?

reply
lfittl
2 hours ago
[-]
I don't think Tom's perspective has necessarily changed (and there is certainly concern from others that this could cause less reports on planner bugs), but Tom is pretty good about not standing in the way of others (i.e. Robert Haas in this case) trying to make things work, and being open to new perspectives.

I do know that one of the important criteria for getting this in was that a bad advice can't cause the planner to fail, and that's something that was explicitly included in the design of pg_plan_advice.

reply