An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
83 points
1 day ago
| 6 comments
| arxiv.org
| HN
dieselgate
8 minutes ago
[-]
From my undergrad engineering math I understand some context here but am getting confused after a decade of programming. Words like "compact" and "closure" [0] probably do not translate directly to the mathematics space from software development - but don't really expect them to...

Thanks for the post it's a good kick in the rear to explore conceptually what eigenvalues/vectors are again!

[0]: from looking up "compact operator" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator

reply
_alternator_
1 hour ago
[-]
Seem reasonably concise, but I think Kreyzsig's Introduction to Functional Analysis with Applications fills the "gap" that this paper wants to fill. It's readable, has applications, exercises, and is more complete.
reply
srean
2 hours ago
[-]
That sure is one compact document. Pun intended. The document is very readable too.
reply
throwaway81523
2 hours ago
[-]
(2019). No exercises.
reply
oakinnagbe
2 hours ago
[-]
Genuine question: does the writing tool matter at all here if the exposition is clear and mathematically correct? I’ve seen great notes written in Word, LaTeX, and even slides—quality seems independent of format.
reply
throwaway81523
2 hours ago
[-]
I would say it's not statistically independent. See https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=304 item #1. So we get to add another exception, which is fine.
reply
anioko1
1 hour ago
[-]
Interesting!
reply
hamburgererror
4 hours ago
[-]
Not LaTeX...
reply
CyLith
4 hours ago
[-]
DABM writes everything in MS Word.
reply
DarkNova6
4 hours ago
[-]
So... ?
reply