7.8 magnitude earthquake shakes part of southern Philippines. Tsunami possible
87 points
6 hours ago
| 8 comments
| yahoo.com
| HN
phyzix5761
3 hours ago
[-]
I was in that earthquake. Was finally able to check in to a hotel now. It was very scary. The room was shaking for at least 5 minutes and the walls were cracking. We all ran outside, down the stairs, and waited across the street until the engineers told us to walk far away. Then the siding started falling from the building (29 floors).
reply
stingraycharles
2 hours ago
[-]
I felt it as well in Cebu, so I can only imagine what it was like when much closer to it. And there was a 8.0+ one in the northeast last month as well, right?
reply
lawgimenez
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm in Northern Cebu, never felt it. I guess you are in the city.
reply
EE84M3i
2 hours ago
[-]
I thought the general recommendation is to stay inside during an earthquake to avoid the facade falling issue and injury from evacuation?

Or is that only in places with certain building codes?

reply
YZF
2 hours ago
[-]
In BC, Canada, the recommendation is to take cover under a desk e.g.

My personal take is that if I have a chance to make it quickly out of a building I prefer to be out of it rather than having it collapse on me. It's one of those things where the recommendation probably is the right thing for the general population and all expected earthquakes but I'm optimizing for something else. You have 10-20 seconds realistically. But yes things falling off the walls and off buildings and anything that can fall on you is a risk. In my office or home e.g. I'm typically on the ground floor within seconds of an exit so my mental preparation is to avoid the building falling on me. Maybe it's the wrong calculus but hey...

reply
Gibbon1
1 hour ago
[-]
In the Loma Prieta earthquake most of my coworkers fled the newly constructed office building. Dodged falling ceramic roofing tiles. And then ran across the parking lot to take safety under the power lines.
reply
gib444
2 hours ago
[-]
I've always wondered about that and how human fear may override training and advice.

Seems like you would be fighting the part of your brain telling you it's (solely) /your/ building collapsing and you need to get out

And wondering if the building is up to code, and trusting that in the moment

reply
ajb
22 minutes ago
[-]
Training and advice is about the expected disaster, not necessarily the one you are in.

In 9/11, lots of people escaped the south tower using elevators, which is the opposite of what you're told to do. There are people who died because they chose to follow the stair route. But others died because they were trapped in elevators.

reply
zuzululu
1 hour ago
[-]
Hope you are staying safe

Does Philippines have seismic building codes?

Probably not right ?

reply
smcin
5 hours ago
[-]
The most reliable up-to-date source is typically Phivolcs, but currently their website is overloaded, so X/Twitter:

https://www.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/earthquake-information/

https://x.com/phivolcs_dost?lang=en

> PHIVOLCS-DOST @phivolcs_dost

#EarthquakePH #EarthquakeSarangani #iFelt_SaranganiEarthquake

Earthquake Information No.2

Date and Time: 08 June 2026 - 07:37 AM Magnitude = 7.8 Depth = 033 km Location = 05.57°N, 124.98°E - 032 km S 04° W of Maasim (Sarangani)

http://x.com/phivolcs_dost/status/2063780683978535398 https://x.com/phivolcs_dost/status/2063780683978535398/photo...

reply
pull_my_finger
5 hours ago
[-]
Phivolcs literally gets hugged to death after almost every significant event. Really unfortunate considering the subject matter.
reply
nomilk
4 hours ago
[-]
Unacceptable given it could be life and death. Understandable that clients' coverage struggles courtesy of Philippines' patchy cellular networks, but far less forgivable that a server for a critical emergency website has problems.
reply
romaniitedomum
5 hours ago
[-]
Civil Defence here in NZ is saying there's no tsunami threat (to NZ anyway):

https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/

reply
latch
4 hours ago
[-]
Felt it ~600KM away in a high floor, building was swaying. Others didn't feel it and at first I thought I was just [unusually] light-headed or something, but then we realized a door was swinging back and forth slightly, and a hanging plant was swaying.
reply
ChrisArchitect
3 hours ago
[-]
Since the submitted link is a yahoo syndication of AP...

Here's the AP source which is being updated more rapidly, including title updates:

https://apnews.com/article/philippines-earthquake-mindanao-6...

reply
lawgimenez
1 hour ago
[-]
It's now confirmed that the Cotabato Trench caused the earthquake. It's scary that this trench has been moving a lot lately during the past few years.
reply
enraged_camel
5 hours ago
[-]
Lots of sources claiming it might be anywhere between 8.0 and 9.0.
reply
hinata08
43 minutes ago
[-]
Lots of sources are initially approximate or conflicting, scientists consolidate and update the figures within minutes, but tabloid journalists take the highest bid

You need to wait for a story to build up to have a clear picture

I live in some area where an earthquake you can hardly feel happen every other year. Some newspapers would tell reader how it was pandemonium when one of these just stroke (because they have a new topic besides city hall plans to install a bench that's nowhere near trees)

reply
albert_e
5 hours ago
[-]
Al Jazeera:

> The US National Tsunami Warning Center, which downgraded the quake from an earlier estimate of magnitude 8.2, said the quake posed no threat to coastal areas of the US.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/8/tsunami-warnings-iss...

reply
ninjin
4 hours ago
[-]
Yes, that is common though. You have a variety of measurements, from a variety of technologies, from a variety of distances, and from a variety of sources. Given the damage a quake and tsunami can cause, especially the early measurements are estimates that later get corrected in light of new information. In Japan for example, it is very much not uncommon that early tsunami warnings are later cancelled. Yes, false alarms are bad, but the example I usually use in terms of how much time can matter is the 1983 Sea of Japan quake [1], where the tsunami hit in 12 minutes after the quake.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Sea_of_Japan_earthquake

reply
trick-or-treat
3 hours ago
[-]
3 foot tsunami waves? I've made bigger waves in soup.
reply
jjav
2 hours ago
[-]
A tsunami wave isn't necessarily high, it is not at all like a regular wave which arrives on shore, breaks and immediately dissipates. A tsunami wave could be just a handful of inches high but it keeps coming on and on and on, pushing more and more water in as the incoming rush of water seems to never stop.
reply
somat
1 hour ago
[-]
It is why I don't think tidal wave is a bad term for the phenomena, A wave that comes in like the tide. at least as good as tsunami, literally harbor wave, Which I guess is a wave you get in a harbor(a place with no waves usually)
reply
skullone
3 hours ago
[-]
This could have been so much worse if a big tsunami was triggered though. Thankful the shaking didn't generate one
reply