Waymo Premier
42 points
2 hours ago
| 9 comments
| waymo.com
| HN
CaliforniaKarl
24 minutes ago
[-]
I wonder how the subscription would respond to a person's area being blocked off.

There construction happening a block down the road from me. As part of the work, the rightmost lane is often blocked during the day (in between rush hours), so that things like concrete pumping can take place. The lane block starts just before where I live.

Around the same time, I noticed that when I would try to take Waymo (which I used to get to PT), I'd be told that things are busy and rides are paused. Recently, I've noticed that if I'm at work (or the PT place) and I want to take a Waymo back home, I'm told "Can't get to that spot right now".

If I had Waymo Premier, I wonder how hard it would be to get a refund on my subscription.

The above talks about a complete block (or, a complete-enough block) to using the service, but what about a major impediment? For example, let's say I travel regularly, and use Waymo to get to/from San Jose airport. Waymo's been disabling highway routes, which for me equates to 20-minute (or more) travel-time increase from home to airport. Would that be enough to qualify for a refund on the subscription?

reply
nemomarx
4 minutes ago
[-]
Is 20 minutes of extra time a major impediment? I don't think I would get a refund on an Uber if they were a little late to pick me up and drove slowly so I lost 20 minutes in total. Although if that does happen maybe I'm just naive about refunds
reply
philip1209
19 minutes ago
[-]
Cash back is huge for people expensing rides. “Spend company money on us, and take your personal rides every once in a while for free.”

Same model as airlines.

reply
falcor84
16 minutes ago
[-]
And hotels.com
reply
smy20011
1 hour ago
[-]
It will pay for itself if you spend >300$ per month. I personally wish Waymo have a 399$ per month subscription that give 2 free ride per day so I don't need to own a car just for work.
reply
ErroneousBosh
40 minutes ago
[-]
That sounds more expensive than just owning a car.
reply
minwcnt5
6 minutes ago
[-]
Depends where you live. In SF, parking is more than $300/mo if you have to pay for a spot. Also, many companies subsidize Waymo rides for employees as part of their commuter benefits.
reply
servercobra
37 minutes ago
[-]
Car payment, insurance, parking, gas/electricity? Going to be over $400/mo in almost all cases in any of the cities Waymo is in.
reply
libria
25 minutes ago
[-]
Add tag tax, residential parking, subsidized work parking, maintenance, incurred violations, tolls.

400/mo or 5000/yr for not having to worry about all that plus never playing the "wait let's circle the block, maybe a spot has opened up" game... sounds tempting.

reply
agumonkey
31 seconds ago
[-]
maintenance, petty car body degradations.. things gets pricey real fast
reply
tjohns
16 minutes ago
[-]
"Incurred violations" should be effectively $0. How often are you getting a traffic ticket? I think the last time I got a ticket was a decade ago...
reply
ihaveajob
6 minutes ago
[-]
Spread across a city probably more than you think, especially if you include parking tickets. I've never had a driving ticket, and maybe 4 parking ones over decades, but I'm probably on the lower end of the curve. In their first 40 days of operation, Oakland's speed cameras issued 82,000 tickets according to reports. I welcome those as they make streets safer, and I think they should be low cost, but high frequency.
reply
tencentshill
36 minutes ago
[-]
That payment gets you a $28k used car at best, assuming no other costs. It won't be anything fancy.
reply
jasonlotito
15 minutes ago
[-]
> assuming no other costs.

Assuming normal costs, you are looking $21-$22k not including taxes.

There is no way you are finding a car for $28k for just $400. Trust me.

reply
applicative
31 minutes ago
[-]
"the total average annual cost of ownership—which includes your car payment, depreciation, fuel, insurance, maintenance, and taxes—is approximately $12,297 per year (or $1,025 monthly) over a 15-year lifetime"
reply
Rumudiez
26 minutes ago
[-]
that's crazy. my 2005 volvo, 1991 nissan, and 1986 toyota altogether cost me a little over $1k per year (mostly insurance) and it was less than $10k total to buy them all. goes to show average financial literacy in the US. people won't save a few grand for a used car (or take out a small loan even!) and then pay 10x the cost for new

edit: to those asking about gas prices, why don't you just do the math for your own driving habits? I don't have the same commute as you and you (probably, I guess definitely if you're asking) don't share my hobbies. regardless, there is no way I'm spending the $10k difference on gas or parts!

reply
cortesoft
11 minutes ago
[-]
You don’t pay for gas? Oil changes? New tires? Air filters?
reply
tjohns
8 minutes ago
[-]
Oil changes cost like $35/year if you do it yourself. Decent tires last 4-5 years, so that's like $100/year (to be generous). Air filters are so cheap and need replacement so infrequently as to not even be worth counting.
reply
yoavm
22 minutes ago
[-]
Do they run on air?
reply
yodon
9 minutes ago
[-]
I'd be more interested in a $29/month surcharge if Waymo weren't already significantly more expensive than Uber/Lyft to begin with.
reply
readams
4 minutes ago
[-]
When you consider the required tipping, the cost is quite close. And the Waymo is nicer.
reply
swyx
1 hour ago
[-]
> Waymo Premier costs $29.99 per month and will be initially offered to select riders in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Phoenix.

> Waymo Premier is a new invite-only membership program built for those who rely on us most. For a monthly fee, members gain access to a suite of exclusive benefits designed to make their journey more seamless and rewarding:

Priority Pickups: Skip the line with prioritized matching

Ride Savings: Earn 10% Waymo Cash back on every trip, and even more during busy times.

Early Access: Be among the first to experience Waymo in new cities, as we expand.

Flexible Cancellations: Peace of mind with up to five free cancellations per month.

---

ok so just amazon prime for waymo. its alright but i feel like they had the chance to go REALLY high end with like a $300/month plan that people will still pay for because supply is so limited. instead they went mass consumer with a name like "Premier". eh.

(sorry waymo person reading this i know what its like to name a thing and regret it)

reply
Almondsetat
1 hour ago
[-]
>Be among the first to experience Waymo in new cities, as we expand

How is this useful in any way? by definition it's a subscription for people already using the service in the (few) supported cities. If I use it in Denver, why would I care to have early access in Washington?

reply
rafram
59 minutes ago
[-]
I imagine they'll try to get new users to sign up for a month of Premier to try Waymo early once it becomes available in their city. Basically juice a few thousand early adopters for 30 bucks each, which also lets them judge demand and gives them some extra revenue to build out their vehicle/parking network before the full launch.
reply
daheza
20 minutes ago
[-]
Pay $30 to be a beta tester for self driving cars in a new city. I wouldn’t sign up for that.
reply
brokensegue
32 minutes ago
[-]
i assumed it's for influencers who want to make a video of the new city or something
reply
pavon
1 hour ago
[-]
If you travel a lot for work and would prefer to use Waymo over Uber or renting.
reply
0gs
56 minutes ago
[-]
yeah, as with so many things, sounds like enterprise users are the target. and enterprise users travel to different cities all the time!
reply
xnx
56 minutes ago
[-]
A lot of people (myself included) would pay $30 to get Waymo a month earlier in their home city.
reply
themanmaran
50 minutes ago
[-]
Agreed! If you're a 20+ company in SF you're required to offer commuter benefits (up to $340 / month).

That's usually things like caltrain / muni. But I would definitely sponsor a $300/mo waymo subscription if it was like 20 rides a month.

reply
paulsutter
1 hour ago
[-]
What I want is a way to rent a car for an hour or two, so that I can leave shopping items or child seats in the car while making stops around town.
reply
jerlam
21 minutes ago
[-]
AAA had car-sharing as a service nine years ago, but it and many of its competitors have closed:

https://oaklandside.org/2024/07/25/gig-will-shut-down-its-ca...

reply
keane
29 minutes ago
[-]
I assume you mean a self-driving vehicle but if not: https://www.zipcar.com/cities
reply
mmoustafa
48 minutes ago
[-]
I think you're looking at $60 an hour which is not horrible (estimating Waymo avg is 3 rides / hour x $20 per ride)
reply
jimkleiber
51 minutes ago
[-]
Like Waymo meets Zipcar?
reply
toddmorey
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm SO tired of subscription services that only offer the opportunity to buy more stuff.

  - Doordash wants you to subscribe
  - AMC movies want you to subscribe
  - Now Waymo wants you to subscribe
You can't buy anything now without being hassled for a subscription. I don't see any value here except for when they degrade the service for non-subscribers to make the priority pickups seem worth it.
reply
kylehotchkiss
39 seconds ago
[-]
What's worse... subscription hassle or a tip hassle?
reply
asveikau
1 hour ago
[-]
This type of subscription model is a little less annoying, most "normal" people will sign up for the non-subscription rate, and frequent users are already frequent users, so they will be more OK with a subscription.

Speaking personally, I don't see enough movies or do enough ride shares to want to subscribe to AMC or Waymo, but Doordash would make sense. Maybe it's OK for me to pay a higher price for the ~1 time per year I use those other services.

reply
wat10000
55 minutes ago
[-]
The problem is that they'll keep advertising it to you. I'm already giving them money, but they'll still push me to subscribe while I'm in the middle of trying to give them my money, because that's not enough for them.
reply
graphime
31 minutes ago
[-]
> The problem is that they'll keep advertising it to you

If you don’t like it, then change providers.

If all providers do it, then you must pay to avoid advertisements.

Or, complain to your elected government representatives.

What’s that? Your Chase/Amex credit card gives you a monthly/annual credit? Ok. No more complaints then.

reply
modwilliam
1 hour ago
[-]
AMC doesn't fit here, once you subscribe to a list there's basically no additional cost. And the lower tiers skip fees etc
reply
pavon
54 minutes ago
[-]
The existence of loyalty clubs are fine. If you use the service a lot, then it is a better deal, and the company gets the benefit that you are more likely to consolidate your spending with them rather than shop around. Win-win.

It is the fact that you can't do anything without them being pushed down your throat that is infuriating. Every interaction with a company these days is an attempt to up-sell. When a small number of retail stores started that, I stopped doing business with them. Now they all do it.

reply
nicebyte
57 minutes ago
[-]
If done right, this is more like a monthly bus pass
reply
ErroneousBosh
36 minutes ago
[-]
Why not just get a monthly bus pass?
reply
JumpCrisscross
33 minutes ago
[-]
> Why not just get a monthly bus pass?

It's less convenient, doesn't work nationally and isn't as fun?

reply
colesantiago
1 hour ago
[-]
I wonder if these services would be instead be like micropayments (charged by $0.01 per minute) instead of a costly $20/mo subscription it would make more sense.
reply
aduffy
34 minutes ago
[-]
> “I never got my driver's license, and I rely on Waymo to commute to an office every day," said Sarah Paige Roland, a Waymo rider in Phoenix. "I get privacy, time back, a safe ride, and I'm not obligated to talk to someone that I don't want to talk to."

I recognize that this is a luxury product but I kind of laughed out loud at this testimonial. The amount of privilege you need to have to grow up and live in *Arizona* without ever learning how to drive is insane.

reply
ativzzz
30 minutes ago
[-]
Alternatively, consider the person is disabled and is physically incapable of driving.
reply
dabinat
1 hour ago
[-]
This caught my eye:

> I'm not obligated to talk to someone that I don't want to talk to

I’m wondering what we lose as a society if people never have to be in even a mildly uncomfortable situation. There’s a book called The Comfort Crisis about this topic.

EDIT: The full quote is “I get privacy, time back, a safe ride, and I'm not obligated to talk to someone that I don't want to talk to.”

In her quote she chose to separate safety and having a conversation with a stranger as two separate issues.

reply
junon
1 hour ago
[-]
As a gay dude I experienced my fair share of "uncomfortable" Uber rides from or to various places. No thanks. I don't need to stimulate those kinds of social skills or whatever.

Can't even imagine what women go through.

reply
klmarks
42 minutes ago
[-]
Now the human supervisors in the Philippines watch you through the Waymo cameras and talk about you.
reply
junon
17 minutes ago
[-]
I don't care what people think about me. I care about the guy who has Jesus hung in every nook and cranny with a candle lit in his front cupholder telling me that I need to repent. In San Francisco, I might add.

I couldn't care less what people in the Philippines - one of the most gay-friendly countries in Asia - think of me through a camera stream.

reply
daheza
18 minutes ago
[-]
Some regulation that limited the operators to work in the city they supervise would be an easy job win for some politicians. Create some jobs and look like you’re standing up to big tech.
reply
JumpCrisscross
34 minutes ago
[-]
> the human supervisors in the Philippines watch you through the Waymo cameras and talk about you

Literally don't care. What I don't need is to be evangelised with whatever conspiracy theory or fringe religion my driver just joined the entire way back from JFK.

reply
MBlume
29 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, and? What is your threat model here?
reply
spike021
1 hour ago
[-]
One time I hopped in an Uber and got a missionary-like lecture on Islam and an invite to go to a mosque.

More typical of Christians so it kind of threw me off.

But anyway, a paid service shouldn't be starting that kind of conversation unless for some reason I started it and even then that'd make it just as uncomfortable for the driver.

reply
pirate787
1 hour ago
[-]
This is the real issue:

"Uber received over 400,000 sexual assault and misconduct reports between 2017 and 2022"

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/uber-liable-pay-8-5-million-...

reply
ErroneousBosh
37 minutes ago
[-]
That averages out at 220 reports a day, which kind of sounds like a lot to me.
reply
rafram
46 minutes ago
[-]
I think "people should just deal with uncomfortable situations" (while in a vehicle that they have no control over!) is not a winning argument, but the continuing march toward tech-enabled isolation is absolutely bad.

It can be annoying to have to deal with irrational humans who make mistakes, but that really is just part of life! I'll take some cumbersome conversations over conducting my entire life via corporate app interfaces.

reply
lern_too_spel
1 hour ago
[-]
There are uncomfortable situations that you can walk away from like a checkout counter, and then there are uncomfortable situations where you are in a car in an unfamiliar location driven by the person making you uncomfortable.
reply
klmarks
44 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, some people apparently can't figure out that if you sit in the back of the cab, the driver doesn't talk and probably also prefers it that way.

They need a technical solution for issues that a 10 year old can figure out.

reply