A calculator that doesn't round
27 points
3 days ago
| 8 comments
| constructive-calculator.dimview.org
| HN
__alexs
3 hours ago
[-]
> Hans Boehm built a Java library for this in the 1980s and 90s

Hans is such a prolific programmer that he wrote a Java library before Java was even invented?

reply
tomjakubowski
2 hours ago
[-]
The article has so many of the hallmarks of LLM writing, naturally it will have some hallucinated factoids too. "What that gives you: [bullet list]", "What got ported: [bullet list]", "foo: x, y, just z"

Boehm's Java library has copyright dates of 1999 and 2001-2004. https://www.hboehm.info/new_crcalc/CR.java

The whitepaper was only published in 2005: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156783260...

I have a dimview now of the blog, and of this Swift port of the library, indeed.

reply
dimview
7 minutes ago
[-]
Thank you. Of course the dates were out of order. The Java library (com.hp.creals) is 1999-2004, paper is from 2005. Unfortunate price of LLM-assisted development. Corrected.
reply
nxobject
2 hours ago
[-]
Well, you know, you go into your Smalltalk-80 workstation for a hack sesh, and an all-nighter later you end up with an implementatkon of Swing...
reply
dimview
3 days ago
[-]
Author here. I could not find a constructive‑reals calculator on iPhone, so I ported the engine Android uses: Hans Boehm's com.hp.creals plus AOSP's UnifiedReal/BoundedRational. Used Opus 4.8 to do the port and Fable 5 for the review.

Fable 5 caught a couple of real concurrency bugs the port introduced while adapting Java's synchronized/AsyncTask to Swift concurrency, including one that was a memory‑safety bug on shared singletons like π, not just a wrong digit. None would have shown up in the unit tests. Writeup has the details.

It's an early iPhone TestFlight beta (link in the post); happy to go deep on either the constructive‑reals side or the AI‑assisted‑dev side.

reply
NetMageSCW
2 hours ago
[-]
Maybe you should correct the errors in your post before worrying about the code.
reply
nomel
2 hours ago
[-]
The old HP calculators, and their emulators, have a computer algebra system, for symbolic maths, that supported this. The user interfaces leave much to be desired, but some also have reverse Polish notation!
reply
dimview
20 minutes ago
[-]
This is different from a CAS. For example, if you ask it to do exp(100)+1-exp(100), it does not rearrange and cancel out the two exp(100)s. Instead, it does exp, addition, and subtraction, all with as many digits as you ask for.
reply
bla3
2 hours ago
[-]
> I built one, by porting Boehm’s engine. > It’s 2026, so I didn’t hand-write the port. I directed Opus 4.8 to translate the source line by line into Swift

I wish I could filter out stuff like this. Cool work by Hans Boehm, but what's the value add in this blog post.

reply
B1FF_PSUVM
1 hour ago
[-]
Read. Guy knows what he's doing.
reply
quixoticelixer-
2 hours ago
[-]
I don't get why this is a big deal. All the calculators I've used have been rectangle.
reply
jagraff
3 hours ago
[-]
Very interesting, thank you for posting! I'm curious - roughly how many tokens do you think you used during the initial port and subsequent bug hunting and fixes?
reply
piinbinary
3 hours ago
[-]
It would also be fun to have a full computer algebra system (like maxima) on a phone
reply
dimview
15 minutes ago
[-]
That should be doable, too. Maybe as a next project.
reply
htx80nerd
3 hours ago
[-]
btw if you turn the iphone calc into landscape mode and switch you scientific calc it does Ramanujan's constant without rounding, but stops after the twelve 9s.
reply
dimview
24 minutes ago
[-]
Correct, but if you don't know the next digit is 2, you can think it's all 9s, another representation of an integer number.
reply
Jblx2
3 hours ago
[-]
Edit: Whoops. My bad. This must have been a HN "second chance" winner.
reply
badc0ffee
2 hours ago
[-]
That looks like a link right back to this thread?
reply
ColinWright
2 hours ago
[-]
Er, that's this submission.
reply