If your product is Great, it doesn't need to be Good (2010)
17 points
3 days ago
| 5 comments
| paulbuchheit.blogspot.com
| HN
ChadNauseam
1 hour ago
[-]
Apple messed up one thing about the iPad, which made me never use mine and eventually give it away. Basically, my iPad would die in a couple days if left unplugged. Because I only want to use it about once a week, that means I have to leave it plugged in all the time. Of course I or someone else inevitably wants to plug something else into that charger, so the iPad gets unplugged and forgotten about. Then, in a week when I actually want to use it, it's dead, and I use something else. The result was, I literally never used it.
reply
Retric
1 hour ago
[-]
They boot reasonably quickly, just turn it off.

While on they are constantly listening for a “find my” signal so it’s easy to locate. For the overwhelming majority of people it’s a good tradeoff.

reply
Our_Benefactors
57 minutes ago
[-]
Not a solution. Something like “shutdown after n hours of inactivity” would fix it though.
reply
ryandrake
13 minutes ago
[-]
Or a power button that actually removes power from the device rather than just turning the display off. The "actually shutdown long press + UI" process has --just-- enough friction to make me forget to do it or not bother with it.
reply
Retric
36 minutes ago
[-]
I think in theory general case I’d rather be able to find it easily than have more charge when it’s located. You can generally use one while plugged in.

Anyway, the root of their issue is other people unplugging it, which is a bigger issue than just the iPad. Still if you turn it off before pugging it in the iPad would have ~full charge if someone unplugged it. They hold charge for months on store shelves.

reply
paulryanrogers
1 hour ago
[-]
Is it even possible for tablets to hold a charge so long and provide near instant wake?

Why didn't you try powering it off when done?

reply
graeme
46 minutes ago
[-]
I'm fairly sure my old ipad did, maybe the ipad air 2. My current ipad pro doesn't seem to work this way. I could be mistaken, perhaps I used or charged it more.
reply
actionfromafar
34 minutes ago
[-]
Of course it is possible. From fundamentals alone, it has space for a huge battery. Heck, many cheap laptops can sleep longer than a week and still has some power left.
reply
jonplackett
1 hour ago
[-]
Read something similar the other day about the original Walkman.

The engineers wanted to add recording function, thinking it would help with sales and to only cost a negligible amount to add.

Someone cleverer said no, because if you add that feature now people will be confused what it is for. If they don’t want to record audio, they’ll think the product isn’t for them.

reply
Supermancho
1 hour ago
[-]
Survival bias powers these "insights", 100% of the time.
reply
Zak
11 minutes ago
[-]
Sure, but how many failed consumer products can you name that solved a problem a large number of consumers actually had way better than anything that came before?

I should probably qualify that by saying that a product that looks to be amazing but costs way too much, is impossible to get because of manufacturing issues, or requires a third-party ecosystem that doesn't exist does not actually solve the consumer problem.

reply
conartist6
1 hour ago
[-]
Maybe, but you can't count how many times I see it happen in reverse too. Without saying it directly, a person reveals that they believe there is nothing left to invent or that whatever is currently best established can never ever be replicated or (gasp) beaten.
reply
hyperpallium2
15 minutes ago
[-]
Fewer features = smaller frame, easier to satisfy, better customer targeting.
reply
robbak
40 minutes ago
[-]
> For markets that have purchasing processes with long lists of feature requirements, you should probably just crank out as many features as possible and not waste time on simplicity or usability.

This was great snark.

reply