How Madrid built its metro cheaply
48 points
7 hours ago
| 4 comments
| worksinprogress.co
| HN
thatmf
34 minutes ago
[-]
> Unlike infrastructure projects in Britain or America, which are heavily reliant on external consultants to handle all stages of the project, this group of well-paid in-house engineers led much of the Madrid Metro expansion. The team stayed largely the same throughout the different projects, meaning that they were able to learn from their experience and apply it to future projects.

Imagine that: building expertise in-house and within the governmental org results in better planning and management and thus outcomes.

reply
thewhitetulip
28 minutes ago
[-]
In India metro is either built by private companies in a Public Private Partnership

Or by govt orgs by contracting it out.

Both styles have resulted in massive delays so much so that it has become a meme that metro will be inaugurated 100yrs into the future

Maybe if Govt hired actual engineers like they do for railways then metros will be prioritised

reply
neil_s
1 hour ago
[-]
What would need to be true for SF to replicate this? Would we need alignment at the mayor, state assembly and SFMTA levels?
reply
nextos
40 minutes ago
[-]
It is difficult. I think the key is that Spain has a large corps of civil engineers working for the government. They plan all projects with great detail and then oversee their execution.

Agile regulations against NIMBYism and a world-class civil engineering industry with HQs in Madrid also help.

A good analogy is to ask what would need to be true for Madrid to replicate the AI hub in SF? Great VC, top engineers, certain risk-taking mentality, etc.

So, it's not easy. The environment that creates a fabric for radical innovation is quite different from a statist mentality, although hopefully, both are not mutually exclusive.

reply
rayiner
37 minutes ago
[-]
The sibling comments explain the regulatory differences. But another factor is that competent engineers and executives have much lower opportunity costs to work for the government in Spain because private sector opportunities are far less lucrative than in the U.S.

An ironic downside of America’s leadership in tech and finance is that there is tremendous brain drain out of the public sector.

reply
saguntum
21 minutes ago
[-]
> I think the key is that Spain has a large corps of civil engineers working for the government.

I agree with this. In general jobs with the government are seen as high quality jobs from my understanding. Another commenter mentioned that the high salaries in the private sector in the US brain drain away from the US public sector. In Spain salaries are much lower, so this is perhaps less of an issue in certain fields.

reply
hnav
43 minutes ago
[-]
- Figuring out NIMBY-ism. Anywhere you run a tunnel you're gonna have people suing you and stalling for decades. Less so if you use a tunnel bore machine, but cut and cover is pretty much a non-starter.

- Cost of labor is insanely high due to cost of housing. Short of jumping straight back into the 19th century, setting up temporary housing and bringing in guest laborers this is pretty much non-negotiable.

- Not a ton of expertise left in the country since there's 2 new subway tunnels a decade AFAIK.

- The grift has got to be worse here than in Spain. There if you get $40k in kickbacks that's a nice bonus, here that barely covers your rent for the year.

And then even if you bring the costs down, you have to figure out the taxation. Several billion per mile is the running rate and you may be able to bring that down but then you have ongoing costs. Muni's farebox recovery is only 1/4 of its budget so unless you're making existing lines redundant, there's new ongoing cost. Obviously the choices there will be to go into the pockets of the middle class or not do it at all.

reply
rr808
1 hour ago
[-]
A lot of the price difference between Europe and USA now are wages. US wages for construction workers in NYC or SF are 2 or 3 times that of Madrid. Lots of things are cheap just for this reason alone.
reply
hnav
41 minutes ago
[-]
What came first, the wage or the cost of housing?
reply
rr808
29 minutes ago
[-]
Even states like Mississippi and Iowa have low housing costs and wages much higher than Spain.
reply
Shitty-kitty
9 minutes ago
[-]
If you want to do a real comparison then you have to include the cost of healthcare.
reply
rr808
2 minutes ago
[-]
Yes that is another reason, high healthcare costs for employing workers means higher construction costs in the USA.
reply
awinter-py
28 minutes ago
[-]
tldr cut and cover?
reply