Show HN: Gerrymandle - Daily puzzle game where you redraw electoral districts
48 points
3 hours ago
| 10 comments
| gerrymandle.cc
| HN
aureate
10 minutes ago
[-]
Lovely game! Takes a bit of fiddling to get the hang of it, but so do most puzzles worth doing. The instructions are clear, the presentation is great and I like the decision to prioritise a fun game over representing real Gerrymandering accurately. It looks like a lot of thought has gone into this.
reply
cyode
1 hour ago
[-]
I could see this being a great activity in a high school civics class. Very creative. One rule that tripped me up is:

> If two parties tie in a district, nobody wins it.

This isn't realistic as ties don't happen in practice in elections, and some party will end up representing it. But the spirit of the gerrymandering concept is conveyed well enough.

reply
realmofthemad
1 hour ago
[-]
Yes indeed, not super realistic, since it would never happen. but it does make for a more fun puzzle :)
reply
Wowfunhappy
30 minutes ago
[-]
It's a major factor in today's puzzle, but it doesn't seem to come up as much in past puzzles. I think yesterday's is more fun and doesn't have the unrealism. https://gerrymandle.cc/game/2026-06-17
reply
shagie
28 minutes ago
[-]
There's a board game from a few years ago that I'd recommend for such a situation: https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/252997/mapmaker-the-gerr... - it was a kickstarter and available beyond that for a few years: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1639370584/mapmaker-the...

The designer diary: https://boardgamegeek.com/blog/1/blogpost/111646/designer-di...

    We're three siblings from a gerrymandered district in Austin, Texas, and this is the story of how we designed a board game about gerrymandering — and ended up at the Supreme Court with 82 copies of Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game.
... and a review of it in context: https://civiceducator.org/review-mapmaker-gerrymandering/
reply
Terr_
9 minutes ago
[-]
It would cool if the result-screen showed how voting-reform would have eliminated/reduced the gerrymandering problem.. but I guess that can't happen, since it relies on additional data that's not part of the puzzle.

For example, you can't show how ranked-choice voting would reduce the nefarious win of X without knowing how the Y/Z populace breaks down in terms of voting for the other side over X.

reply
srameshc
1 hour ago
[-]
I love the idea .. how you changed an important issue into a game and probably that would bring awareness. I am not an expert but such decisions probably affect a lot of people and no one spend time and learn about it. This is a fun way to learn. Thank you !!
reply
realmofthemad
1 hour ago
[-]
Glad you enjoyed it!
reply
coder97
1 hour ago
[-]
I think I did not understand this game well. May I suggest adding a few introductory levels of increasing difficulty for beginners.
reply
realmofthemad
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm sorry you've found it a bit difficult to pick up! There is an introduction below the game, but it can still be a bit hard to follow since it's all text. I'll see about adding an additional, optional, interactive tutorial.
reply
pavel_lishin
1 hour ago
[-]
This felt very satisfying to win! (Day 39) I'll try to remember to keep coming back.

I think what made me quite confused at the start is mis-reading the instructions that every district could have no more than four houses; I thought I had to split the land into equal areas. Once I understood that, the solution felt much easier.

reply
giancarlostoro
29 minutes ago
[-]
> Error Code: SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG

Can't view it at all.

reply
MarkusQ
1 hour ago
[-]
I won't let me complete the final district (YRBY+" "s) in today's puzzle. (firefox/linux) If I try to do it earlier it auto includes unwanted cells.
reply
realmofthemad
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, would you mind sending over a screenshot or video of where you are stuck?
reply
gnerd00
22 minutes ago
[-]
great idea to make Gerrymandle! congrats on the alpha

US/California etc gerrymandering is dramatically illegal IMHO. I see the recent gerrymandering in the USA as a kind of political cancer actually....

reply
realmofthemad
13 minutes ago
[-]
Personally I've been very surprised with the public support for the increase in political gerrymandering. I know that people think it is worth it for the short term gains, but it still seems like a bad idea to me.
reply
convolvatron
1 hour ago
[-]
very basic issue, its not clear to me how to start a new district, it just extends the old one. I managed to do it accidentally a couple times, but I don't know how
reply
applfanboysbgon
50 minutes ago
[-]
By default, you work on one district at a time. Clicking adds tiles to the current district until the current district is full, then clicking will create a new district. District size is determined per round, described at the top as eg. "draw 5 districts of 4 populated tiles".

You can also click a square in the "Districts" section of the header to switch to a different district, including an empty one to create a new one.

reply