Supermarket giant Tesco sues VMware for breach of contract
45 points
by wglb
1 hour ago
| 6 comments
| theregister.com
| HN
bellowsgulch
23 seconds ago
[-]
> VMware is essential for the operations of Tesco’s business and its ability to supply groceries

Guess you're fucking it up big time somehow then. Why would you tell people this? "Hey, we managed to make ourselves permanently dependent on some bullshit tech, please partner vendors, fuck as much as you possibly can so we can pass it off to shoppers."

reply
parasubvert
42 minutes ago
[-]
Negotiating tactic. Never really makes it to court.
reply
drchaim
49 minutes ago
[-]
Having VMware in 2026 is a sign of low tech.
reply
hdgvhicv
20 minutes ago
[-]
Compared to something like proxmox? Sure.

It takes a long time to change corporate mindset.

reply
alphabetag675
7 minutes ago
[-]
Compared to something like openstack.
reply
parasubvert
41 minutes ago
[-]
Eh, it's still the least hassle at scale for your own data centers and VCF 9 isn't exactly low tech - it does things no one else really can do to the same level of quality (DRS, HCX, NSX, VSAN all come to mind) , the question is, is it worth the money? Unless you're over 10,000 VMs, probably not.

OpenShift is okay but has quirks unless you have a major Kubernetes staff; Proxmox is good for most but I wouldn't use at massive scale. Azure Stack/ Hyper-V can work but has its own quirks.

reply
diego_moita
7 minutes ago
[-]
They're not the only ones pissed off with VMWare [1].

What I don't understand is what prevents them to shop around for alternatives. What is VMWare's very good moat that prevents the competition from invading their castle?

https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/03/24/half-of-vmwa...

reply
OrvalWintermute
25 minutes ago
[-]
VMware really damaged their business longterm, as anyone that can transition off, is doing so, and anyone else is planning on it.
reply
dreamcompiler
8 minutes ago
[-]
Broadcom doesn't care. They just want to milk VMware for all it's worth to goose their short-term profits.
reply
slater
1 hour ago
[-]
reply