Always wondered if crash reporting is some kind of shady business. It's good to know it does, at minimum, do what it promises and give valuable crash data to MS.
But I would hope that some kind of reverse debugger triggered on one of these crashes would make it pretty simple to say "who wrote this 01".
The story of software development through the ages.
I say this because we've reported a bunch of Windows bugs (mainly running Windows under virtualization) and getting them to pay attention at all is an up-hill battle.
If you have to ask, you can't afford it.
Or do you mean all the windows specific stuff etc, I guess I was more imaging the call stack etc.
No insult was intended XD
Even with embedded programming, regular C debugger has always been enough.
When you're at that level in a company, it's rare that someone would be micromanaging what you work on at all times.
So a total of 46% of the crashes were due to this rogue force-unload of a DLL. This is a case of bucket spray, where a single underlying cause generates a large number of different types of crashes.In a wider sloppier sense some use the term for bugs that are hard to pin down and exhibit wide behaviours.