The origins of the school system aimed to produce independent, critical thinkers
26 points
1 hour ago
| 2 comments
| cbc.ca
| HN
synecdoche
1 hour ago
[-]
I've heard the opposite. That is was designed and based on military organisation and for individuals to conform to the contemporary world view.
reply
speak_plainly
53 minutes ago
[-]
This is true. While Humboldt designed the overarching structure of the school, Johann Gottlieb Fichte argued that Prussia lost to Napoleon because they were too individualistic and was able to influence ideas of early education in those schools. The aim, through Fichte, became a system designed to break parental bonds, who he believed filled kids heads with selfish, private interests, and in turn, the goal of education was to develop children into workers and soldiers. Fichte famously suggested that a proper education should destroy a student's free will so thoroughly that they could never choose to do anything other than what the state required.
reply
EffectFeisty627
10 minutes ago
[-]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Taylor_Gatto Gatto asserts the following regarding what school does to children in Dumbing Us Down:

    It confuses the students. It presents an incoherent ensemble of information that the child needs to memorize to stay in school. Apart from the tests and trials, this programming is similar to the television; it fills almost all the "free" time of children. One sees and hears something, only to forget it again.
    It teaches them to accept their class affiliation.
    It makes them indifferent.
    It makes them emotionally dependent.
    It makes them intellectually dependent.
    It teaches them a kind of self-confidence that requires constant confirmation by experts (provisional self-esteem).
    It makes it clear to them that they cannot hide, because they are always supervised.[
reply
loloquwowndueo
13 minutes ago
[-]
Got any references for this? It’s pretty interesting, would like to know more.
reply
steve1977
46 minutes ago
[-]
Part of the problem might be that the terms are not used in the same way in the Anglosphere and in Germany.

In Germany, the Prussian Reforms refer to what is described in the article and attributed to Wilhelm von Humboldt, this was in the late 18th century.

What you are probably referring to is the Generallandschulreglement by Johan Johann Julius Hecker under Frederick the Great. This was published in 1763, around 40 years before von Humboldt.

reply
netcan
11 minutes ago
[-]
According to Ai... Humbolt's system was reformed after he left office. The "Prussian School System" was the result... the system copied by the US and others. This is the industrial era school system, famous for producing reliable factory workers, soldiers and citizens.
reply
mdp2021
1 hour ago
[-]
Well, where. Of course the Philosopher and the Dictator will have different positions on the matter. The thing is that (1) there is a dialectic between the two perspectives and that (2) in actual historical instances different parties will have had more space for action.
reply
steephax
1 hour ago
[-]
Yes, there's a nice explanation of its origins in Moonwalking with Einstein.
reply
logicchains
53 minutes ago
[-]
The article addresses this:

"Yet over the years, as Humboldt's public education system was adopted, modified and spread around the world, Bildung — the cultivation of our human potential — may well have been the critical piece left out.

Soon, the state's influence on education took hold, with its own agenda. This is explored in part two of the documentary, Humboldt's Ghost."

reply
lmf4lol
32 minutes ago
[-]
I was just reading Schillers letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man. It made me sad that we have such profound insight available on beauty and a fulfilling life, and still produce a school system that is completely contrary to a proper human existence.

I also vividly recall pg’s reflections on the school system in Hackers and Founders. He was spot on with his observations and still is. My own experience made so much more sense. He wrote that a decade ago it hink. Still, Nothing changed!

I have two daughters. One just finished primary school and the second is halfway through primary. Its a disaster. They dont learn proper reading and math, they dony learn creativity. Its just a big waste of time sending them there to be honest. Heck, they watch 1 hour of stupid TV shows there everyday.. why??? My wife home schools them additionally, so that they learn proper reading, math, history & art. Its sad that this is necessary. My daughters excel now all tests obviously but its frightening to see how low the average skill level of their peers is. there are 12 year olds who cant read a paragraph or do simple maths in their head. They dont know anything about the history of the country.. Its terrifying that this is the future generation. They need to carry the torch after all.

And its not the kids fault. WE as a society failed them!!!!

ps i am from Amsterdam, NL btw

reply