$22,000 per Hour: Assistants Use a Legislative Loophole to Outearn Surgeons
11 points
16 hours ago
| 3 comments
| nytimes.com
| HN
Neywiny
13 hours ago
[-]
I read the article and I'm still not understanding why this happens. It gave a lot of examples and said a lot about what the law was trying to do But why are they getting this much from arbitration and why aren't the surgeons able to do the same?
reply
littlexsparkee
12 hours ago
[-]
Here is the distinction:

> They do it by capitalizing on a law intended to protect patients from surprise billing by providers not in their insurance plan. Under the law, those providers can file for arbitration, where they are able to make a case for much higher payments than they could otherwise receive from health plans.

reply
ceejayoz
11 hours ago
[-]
But why does the arbitrator deem $22k/hour reasonable? What the fuck is happening at that point?
reply
Neywiny
23 minutes ago
[-]
^^^^ yes I feel like this isn't explained. They may as well be saying they're using a law to protect ducks from poachers or something. I'm not seeing the link between the two concepts. Somebody is deciding to give them this payout and they don't say why.
reply
sscaryterry
16 hours ago
[-]
reply
cyanydeez
14 hours ago
[-]
that loop hole: non-public single payer healthcare.
reply