Camera with transparent display launches for the equivalent of $29
42 points
4 days ago
| 7 comments
| notebookcheck.net
| HN
codazoda
40 seconds ago
[-]
I had the most fun taking pictures with a cheap, low-quality camera that I only owned for a few months before it died. This one might fit the bill nicely. The skill or unknowns of the viewfinder might be part of the charm.

I want one, but they don’t seem to be available yet.

reply
zerobees
2 hours ago
[-]
I don't understand how this works. If it's a transparent display that just passes through light and adds some overlay information (like a viewfinder on d/SLR cameras of the old), then doesn't the frame change completely depending on the distance you're holding the device at in relation to your face?

It can't be meant to be used with your arm fully outstretched, because that would be an impractically narrow field of view. So how do you "calibrate" your stance to make the capture match the FOV of the glass rectangle you're looking through?

reply
zamadatix
1 hour ago
[-]
For a near flat $29 MSRP camera I'm not sure I could come up with better way to have an overlaid viewfinder. The screen itself even looks to be a cheap segmented display, not a grid of pixels.

If you care those things mess up your framing of the shot then you probably don't want a flat $29 camera.

reply
mikestew
1 hour ago
[-]
I think the idea is that the display kinda represents the shot, but not well, but if you cared you wouldn’t be shooting with a $29 camera. I mean, it takes 1920x1080 pics, don’t get too picky there, Ansley Adams. :-)

But I agree with you, I don’t see how the “viewfinder” is all that useful, other than “nifty!”.

reply
circuit10
1 hour ago
[-]
But if it’s giving you no information about what will actually be in frame you might as well just look in front of you and guess
reply
daniel_reetz
8 minutes ago
[-]
Or develop thesense & skill of using it. It clearly has a fixed FOV that's being cropped based on what's on the display.

Humans can learn this stuff, cameras with crude viewfinders have appeared in the past.

reply
benj111
1 hour ago
[-]
Is Ansley Adams this generations David Bailey?
reply
anukin
50 minutes ago
[-]
I think OP meant ansel adams. The guy died even before most of the crowd in HN was born.
reply
nickcw
34 minutes ago
[-]
Maybe it does measure the distance to your face to work out where to show the viewfinder rectangle...
reply
thot_experiment
49 minutes ago
[-]
It's $29, this is a fun gimmick to take pictures of your friends doing bullshit this summer. It's obviously far worse than your phone, the point is that it's fun.
reply
stavros
1 hour ago
[-]
Not only that, but slight changes to the angle you're holding it will result in dramatically different photo angles, even though you're always seeing the same thing.
reply
atombender
4 days ago
[-]
For those struggling to find tech specs: Apparently [1] it has a 2MP CMOS sensor, F2.4 aperture, 24mm equivalent wide-angle lens, and shoots a resolution of 1920x1080.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/toycameras/comments/1ukcl55/godox_c...

reply
neon_diogenes
4 days ago
[-]
When I use a camera with an optical viewfinder, I feel more connected to my subject. Sure all the modern pro cameras are using EVFs now, and their performance is excellent, but I do think it’s a more disconnected shooting experience.

Think about the optical chain.

EVF: Subject —-> real time digital processor —-> screen —-> shooters eye

OVF: subject —-> mirror/glass —-> shooters eye

My hipster take is that makes shooting with an OVF a more “pure” experience. Not that it matters from the subjects POV though..

Seems like a cool camera. I think I will pick one up for my daughter.

reply
unsupp0rted
1 hour ago
[-]
"shooters eye" is doing a lot of work there, since that's where the most pre-processing happens, by far
reply
henvic
35 minutes ago
[-]
> Thanks to its very affordable price, the camera is also an attractive option as a light meter.

Tell me you're writing AI slop without telling me you're writing AI slop.

Why is this news outlet with some low-quality post even on Hacker News?

Product site: https://www.godox.com/product-e/C100.html

reply
ThrowawayTestr
31 minutes ago
[-]
Why does that sentence strike you? This product seems to be a light meter with a camera attached.
reply
henvic
17 minutes ago
[-]
Sure, but that is despite of / or not because it's very affordable. Not thanks to it. Or am I being too picky?
reply
ortusdux
1 hour ago
[-]
I wonder if you could sandwich two polarized lenses in a way that would make it only transparent when your eye is in the correct position. Would make for an elegant & simple WYSIWYG viewfinder.
reply
tencentshill
2 hours ago
[-]
This is probably an LCD panel with the polarizer removed, so the UI will require a bright/strong source of light behind it.
reply
mikestew
1 hour ago
[-]
Going on ten years ago I saw an early transparent OLED screen (TV-sized). It didn’t need a strong light source behind it. Could be those got cheap enough in a small size to put in a $29 camera.
reply