The bottleneck might be the air in the room
117 points
1 hour ago
| 17 comments
| blog.mikebowler.ca
| HN
gpt5
1 hour ago
[-]
I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones. Suddenly, everybody would be aware of the CO2 level in the room, get alerts, etc. and the problem will just solve itself.

There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood. Raising awareness is the only real solution.

reply
legulere
33 minutes ago
[-]
I guess the problem is with the price of the sensors. Just look how expensive the Aranet 4 home shown in article is. There are worse devices for less like the IKEA alpstuga. I also don’t know how much electricity they pull.
reply
Gigachad
30 minutes ago
[-]
I got the ikea sensor, I’d say it’s way more accurate than you need for personal use. I wouldn’t use it as a scientific instrument but it’s well good enough to see if the room is ventilated enough.

I was shocked to see just how fast CO2 climbs while in a room, and how just opening the window just a crack was enough to restore the room to baseline co2.

The thing runs on usb 5v so the power consumption is negligible. It also plugs in to home assistant great.

reply
Liftyee
16 minutes ago
[-]
I would hesitate to say the IKEA is worse. Inside the IKEA is a reputable Sensirion all in one sensor module. It's much cheaper and smaller because the CO2 sensor in it is using different (newer) technology that only released a few years ago from Sensirion.

(Upd: the IKEA does have lower accuracy, with ±100 ppm instead of ±30 ppm. From the SEN63C datasheet)

reply
scoot
48 minutes ago
[-]
Apple watches already have a blood-oxygen sensor so it's covered, albeit indirectly.
reply
oasisbob
33 minutes ago
[-]
I don't think that's true at all. Capnography, the measure of carbon dioxide partial pressure is wholly separate from pulseox:

> Pulse oximeters have some limitations. They can only employ light at two wavelengths. Thus the devices can only distinguish between hemoglobin and oxygenated hemoglobin. When carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin are also present, there are two additional wavelengths required for differentiation. In the presence of elevated carboxyhemoglobin levels, pulse oximetry overestimates the true saturation of oxygen as carboxyhemoglobin binds with a higher affinity than oxygen. In the case of carbon monoxide poisoning, the absorbance spectrum of carbon monoxide is very similar to hemoglobin, which results in a falsely high level of oxygen (overestimation of oxygen saturation) ...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539754/

reply
Terr_
23 minutes ago
[-]
I don't think that's safe to assume at all, for two reasons:

1. CO2 has effects on the human body of its own that aren't simply a lack of oxygen, and vice-versa. [0]

2. The baseline proportions involved aren't close, so even doubling CO2 isn't going to show up easily as a large swing in in oxygen%.

For example, the article references a study where the CO2 proportion going from 0.04% -to 0.25% correlates to mental problems.

Even if the watch could sample atmosphere directly, is it sensitive enough to detect a shift from 21.00% -> 20.79% oxygen?

As it's estimating oxygen in the owner's blood, it might not detect anything different at all... not if the owner's body has already compensated by breathing harder or by "underclocking" their brain to make dumber decisions.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asphyxiant_gas

reply
ErroneousBosh
6 minutes ago
[-]
> The article references a study where the CO2 proportion going from 0.04% -to 0.25% causes mental problems. In other words, a difference in 0.21% of the air.

I'm finding that pretty difficult to believe, to be quite honest with you.

And before you say "aha, carbon dioxide brain fog!" consider that I'm about a mile from the sea with a 40mph onshore breeze. This air is about as oxygenated as it gets.

reply
deanc
56 minutes ago
[-]
I’m not saying this isn’t a legitimate concern but this really seems to have exploded amongst the tech community as the next obsession.

I see this pop up on X every few weeks. Is the concern about this really based on actual science? Is there empirical data proving people are less productive or are damaging themselves as a result of heightened CO2 levels? And I don’t mean observational epidemiology studies.

reply
kashishgrover
36 minutes ago
[-]
reply
Krutonium
23 minutes ago
[-]
Somewhat unrelated, Tom also did a great video where he was put in a low oxygen environment. Similarish effects, differentish cause.
reply
Tossrock
59 minutes ago
[-]
Submarines operate in the 1000s of PPM CO2 range and the sailors aboard generally do not experience any ill effects. This was tested and no deficits were found even at 15,000 PPM: https://asma.kglmeridian.com/view/journals/amhp/89/6/article...
reply
w-m
31 minutes ago
[-]
I don't think you can cleanly compare this: In the study, they added CO2 to the room, while keeping O2 at normoxic levels throughout the experiment. In your meeting room, O2 levels will be dropping in lock-step with the CO2-levels rising. It may be the lack of oxygen that leads to drowsiness, not the additional CO2. But it's the CO2 levels that you can measure as a good proxy of overall air quality.
reply
KerrickStaley
10 minutes ago
[-]
I don't think this is correct. The concentration of CO2 in air is about 0.04%, whereas the concentration of oxygen is 20%, so the partial pressure of oxygen is about 500x higher. This means that if, for example, 10% of the oxygen in a room spontaneously disappeared, it would be replaced about sqrt(500) = 22x faster through leaks in the room than a 10% spontaneous CO2 increase would dissipate. (This ignores a small effect due to the different density of the two gases).

So in practice the oxygen level can never drift meaningfully far from the atmospheric pressure, whereas carbon dioxide easily can because the pressures involved are so low.

reply
hahahaa
17 minutes ago
[-]
O2 is 200000ppm so if co2 goes up 400 to 2000ppm does o2 go down to 198400ppm?
reply
Robin_Message
43 minutes ago
[-]
If that study was of submariners, is it possible long-term high-level exposure causes the body to adapt?

I am suspicious of 0.1% having a significant effect though, given oxygen is around 20% and we naturally exhale a couple of percent CO2.

reply
culturestate
40 minutes ago
[-]
One key difference is that submariners are rigorously trained to operate effectively in less-than-ideal environmental conditions, whereas Bob from accounting probably is not.
reply
brookst
52 minutes ago
[-]
Though that study included a 45 minute acclimation period. Appropriate for submarines, but I wonder what the results would be in the first 1 / 5 / 10 minutes.
reply
threatripper
9 minutes ago
[-]
CO2 levels will rise much more slowly to such high levels even in a small room.
reply
kashishgrover
41 minutes ago
[-]
Oh this is absolutely so relevant and I wonder if there are any high quality studies that have analyzed driving performance against CO2 buildup in cars. Cars often ship with circulate air feature in the aircon, and people use it aggressively, nonchalantly at least where I live, having no idea about the dangers of possible hypoxia and sleepiness that might be inducing in them while driving. It is absolutely critical in my opinion for cars to have CO2 monitors. We put so many sensors in cars these days that this seems to be a really cheap and fairly high value of life addition that could possibly prevent accidents on roads. I keep a portable CO2 sensor in my car at all times, because sometimes circulation is not something I can avoid when stuck in traffic or when passing by a drain.
reply
npunt
32 minutes ago
[-]
Got a firsthand experience with this. I was dropping off my girlfriend and we stopped to talk in the car, with all the windows up. Over the course of the conversation we got more and more agitated at each other until I had a thought and pulled my Aranet out from my backpack. It was >3000ppm CO2. We opened windows and within 2 minutes all the agitation went away.
reply
infofarmer
26 minutes ago
[-]
Yeah, I measured over 5000ppm in a taxi with two passengers. Showed the driver how to enable air intake (he didn’t know about the feature) and tried to explain this is deadly. Pretty sure this is commonplace globally.

Generally it’s a miracle to me so many people survive traffic on public roads, statistically.

reply
_thisdot
29 minutes ago
[-]
Relevant video of someone experimenting with a CO2 monitor in a car: https://youtu.be/hr9w-ZixAqc
reply
ErroneousBosh
10 minutes ago
[-]
Cars are not sufficiently sealed for that to make any kind of a difference.
reply
esikich
21 minutes ago
[-]
Cars aren't hermetically sealed vessel. This is hilarious.
reply
eitau_1
10 minutes ago
[-]
Can someone provide an explanation why CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm have such a negative influence given the fact that CO2 concentration in lungs (at rest) never falls below 10000 ppm?
reply
fer
6 minutes ago
[-]
It simply makes the baseline higher. If you want to go to extreme cases, check carbogen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbogen

reply
oasisbob
45 minutes ago
[-]
There needs to be a meter for the amount of AI writing in blogposts. Same physics, same climb, same afternoon fog.
reply
stavros
36 minutes ago
[-]
Yeah, it's really tiring reading Claude's output all day, every day. Nowadays I yearn for a different style.
reply
_def
49 minutes ago
[-]
> Then, somewhere in the second hour, the room quietly gets worse at making them.

Maybe it's not just the air but also the multi-hour meetings that drive people to a sense of "oh god let this finally end now", which leads do decisions that fall short.

reply
rikschennink
33 minutes ago
[-]
“That number matters more than it looks.”, then the next paragraph starts with “Here is the uncomfortable part”, and then I closed the tab.
reply
throwaway81523
1 hour ago
[-]
Don't forget too, if the CO2 is 1000 ppm, then half of the air in each breath you inhale was recently exhaled by someone else. Yes, airborne viruses are still spreading. I still wear an N95 mask whenever I'm in an indoor space with other people outside of home.

IKEA now has a remarkably cheap ($35) air quality monitor that measures CO2 as well as PM:

https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/alpstuga-air-quality-sensor-sma...

I don't have one yet but plan to pick one up soon. A CO2 sensor alone from Adafruit is $50+, though that one is more precise. I bought it a while ago and it's still sitting in my todo bin.

reply
boernard
13 minutes ago
[-]
could you observe an effect on your health after starting to wear the mask? like sickness days per year?
reply
bebe9494i4
48 minutes ago
[-]
I do not give a damm about masks, but yet another reason to prefer work from home.

Flu and other air transmited diseases should be treated as a workplace injury, with proper compensation!

reply
sixtyj
53 minutes ago
[-]
A lot of CO2 is bad for thinking.

CO2 is just a tip as office or home is toxic environment anyway. Plastic (e.g. carpets), formaldehyde in furniture, air fresheners… add home office and cooking at home (-> small carcinogenic particles)…

If you start reading How not to die by Michael Greger, you find out that dust, soda and sitting - not CO2 - are real killers…

It's similar to how people think sharks and airplanes are the biggest killers - when in reality it is coconuts, mosquitoes, and motorcycles.

reply
bebe9494i4
46 minutes ago
[-]
My previous employer had dogs shit on carpets, without proper desinfection! Just smearing excrements into carpet, waiting for it to dry out, so it can go airborne!
reply
_def
47 minutes ago
[-]
How do you avoid/reduce exposure to dust? Genuine question
reply
Dove
41 minutes ago
[-]
Air filters, decluttering, regular deep cleaning, replacing dust-friendly surfaces and furniture (such as carpet, drapes, and upholstered sofas) with things like wood, vinyl, or leather. HVAC maintenance, cleaning, and filters. Washable allergen covers for things like pillows and mattresses.
reply
hobofan
38 minutes ago
[-]
HEPA-filter air purifier and a robot vacuum that is scheduled to run while your are not in the apartment (to reduce baseline dust) are probably the most simple/cost-effective measures.
reply
throw-the-towel
42 minutes ago
[-]
Use an air purifier, wear a respirator outside if you live in a polluted place.
reply
Gigachad
27 minutes ago
[-]
Air purifier is good for PM2.5 and other microscopic pollutants but it doesn’t do that much for dust unless it’s particularly light dust and very close to the purifier.

Dust is much more likely to just settle on the ground and be kicked back up than it is to move all the way to the purifier to get stuck in the filter.

reply
a1371
1 hour ago
[-]
The building science community has not buy and large came to the agreement that the CO2 itself is the cause of the cognitive decline. It could be the Canary in the coal mine telling us there is an accumulation of compounds causing the decline.

Why that matters? You need good ventilation regardless, but instead of just thinking of CO2, try to minimize compounds in your air by selecting things for the room that smell less and off-gas less.

reply
vasco
27 minutes ago
[-]
Similar to this a closed motorcycle helmet without air circulation increases CO2 extremely rapidly, within 60s it's already at really high levels. Open your visor when you stop!
reply
jwpapi
1 hour ago
[-]
Buying one of these gadgets killed my brain fog
reply
Scroll_Swe
46 minutes ago
[-]
I am able to open the windows at home and at work but have to be reminded to air out, but I always feel much clearer when I do.

Also, take walks. I am lucky to be able to walk to and from work and it helps immensely.

reply
217
1 hour ago
[-]
i love seeing things i saw on twitter two years ago at the front page of hn man like what are we doing
reply
keiferski
1 hour ago
[-]
Yet another reason to have meetings while walking outside: air quality and a natural limit on time, and the mental benefits that come from movement.
reply
sapiogram
1 hour ago
[-]
Requires an area around your office that isn't ugly or overrun with cars.
reply
Scroll_Swe
21 minutes ago
[-]
Scandinavia wins again :)
reply
gostsamo
53 minutes ago
[-]
requires that everyone is comfortable walking and has no physical impairments.

Not to talk about the weather either.

reply
kennywinker
1 hour ago
[-]
> You gather your most expensive people into a room to make your most important decisions.

A terrible way to make decisions.

reply
sixtyj
1 hour ago
[-]
What should be a better way?
reply
hahahaa
9 minutes ago
[-]
Make them mostly async, bringly only the very pointy details that need nutting down sync. If knowledge transfer is needed in a meeting that could be done seperately.

Put it this way do you need to book a 3h meeting with your spouse to decide if to buy a house? Nope all the research and decision criteria were in advance. That final minute of making the decision is a cross check over that work.

reply