Acronym Fatigue Series Introduction: why I'm wary of acronyms
26 points
4 hours ago
| 8 comments
| devz.cl
| HN
collinmcnulty
1 hour ago
[-]
I actually think it’s even worse than the author suggests. Acronyms promote the illusion of understanding. You know the words the acronym stands for and it makes you feel a little bit like you know what it means, but you don’t. All names are meaningless words until we assign them a meaning, but acronyms trick you into thinking the name itself tells you something about what it is.
reply
DanielVZ
1 hour ago
[-]
Absolutely! I’ll dive into this a bit more in the second section, where even technical acronyms can be considered harmful because they are learned at a surface level and then spread at meme-like speed.

For instance most people don’t know that even though both CAP and ACID contain consistency, they do not refer to the same idea. In CAP it’s about linearizability, while in ACID it’s about preserving invariants.

reply
sreekanth67
23 minutes ago
[-]
absolutely. this is an illusion our mind believes.
reply
gumby
7 minutes ago
[-]
My company has a strict NTLA policy.

That’s No Three-Letter Acronyms

Instead we do name things after animals like Lamprey, Remora, Whelk, Axolotl, Tick (the last has not been approved)

reply
needSomeCoffee
1 hour ago
[-]
My pet peeve = authors who start using an acronym without ever "introducing" it. Suddenly there is an acronym used throughout an article, and one has to carefully go back and find the phrase to which it refers. Necessitated because the author was too lazy to introduce the acronym in parens after first using the phrase. Not sure how AI does this, but this problem predates AI by quite a bit.
reply
SoftTalker
46 minutes ago
[-]
YGTR!
reply
lmpdev
2 hours ago
[-]
One thing that irks me quite a bit is when adjacent fields adopt the same acronym for different things

LoRa (RF tech) vs LORA (AI optimisation technique) GLM (statistics) vs GLM (AI model)

reply
stronglikedan
1 minute ago
[-]
That's why it's important to only use acronyms in their context, or provide the context when using them. And for goodness sake, expand them on the first use if you're audience is not already familiar with them! (and really, even if they are, it's just polite)
reply
niccl
1 hour ago
[-]
yes. TLA and XTLA overloading is a real problem, particularly when going cross domain.

Maybe we should insist on some standardised expansion of TLAs and XTLAs so you know unambiguously what any particular Three Letter Acronym or eXtended Three Letter Acronym means. I wish I could think of a way of doing that...

reply
fouc
1 hour ago
[-]
some of my favorite forum communities heavily rely on acronyms. but they also have a maintained gossary that introduces all the community/industry-specific acronyms. Acronyms help boost the density of the information conveyed
reply
stirfish
7 minutes ago
[-]
It's also cheap shibboleth for communities - if you talk like we talk then you're one of us
reply
JoshGG
2 hours ago
[-]
I enjoyed this article about AFSI.
reply
tclancy
2 hours ago
[-]
I felt like it was just another WIWA rehash.
reply
BrokenCogs
1 hour ago
[-]
IFHA
reply
alex1138
1 hour ago
[-]
tl;dr
reply