Strata – An app that talks me out of dying outdoors
9 points
2 hours ago
| 15 comments
| strata.highloop.co
| HN
jcoder
1 hour ago
[-]
“Strata doesn’t just show the data. It makes the call.”

Scroll scroll scroll…

“Strata informs your decisions — it doesn't make them for you.”

I hope you don’t kill someone.

reply
ungreased0675
1 hour ago
[-]
Absolutely the wrong application for an LLM.

How do we know it’s providing correct data?

reply
add-sub-mul-div
1 hour ago
[-]
Worrying about "correctness" is such pre-LLM thinking. What's important now is generating content that doesn't require effort or labor cost.
reply
rafram
1 hour ago
[-]
Well, for the creators’ sakes, I hope the ToS that Claude wrote [1] holds up in court!

[1]: https://strata.highloop.co/terms

reply
weakfish
1 hour ago
[-]
This is gonna kill someone.
reply
snypher
1 hour ago
[-]
Any real avalanche threat analysis is done boots on ground, this app isn't adding any additional information.
reply
rtkwe
1 hour ago
[-]
I think this is taking the data those guys gather, some other data, and distilling it to a threat rating? That's at least what I get from the big above the fold blurb.
reply
ungreased0675
8 minutes ago
[-]
But there is no underlying algorithm crunching the data. It’s Claude simulating the output of such an algorithm.
reply
buildsjets
1 hour ago
[-]
To be perfected, this app needs a feature that uses AI to identify the difference between edible and poisonous plants and fungi.
reply
buildsjets
1 hour ago
[-]
Incoming trademark infringement lawsuit from Strava in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
reply
foxfired
1 hour ago
[-]
Note that there is Strata (strata.com), the 3d software company, which I immediately thought it was about. It was the first 3d software I used some 30 years ago.
reply
daft_pink
1 hour ago
[-]
Make sure you have a very good LLC that can’t be pierced.
reply
planewave
1 hour ago
[-]
Is it just me, or does it seem extremely dangerous to market: “Strata doesn't just show the data. It makes the call.”

The page states it’s powered by Claude with nothing I could see that relates to its performance, metrics, processes, testing, etc. for something expected to be used in a safety application.

reply
cyphar
1 hour ago
[-]
"You're right to push back on that. Let me take a step back and reconsider the requirements for an application that people might entrust with their lives."
reply
jere
1 hour ago
[-]
It's perfectly safe, I assure you.
reply
trillic
1 hour ago
[-]
Should I climb this mountain? Analyze the data. Make no mistakes.
reply
carabiner
1 hour ago
[-]
Read the headline - sounds like a therapy / anti-suicide advocacy app?

Clicked the link - ok looks like it's for ski touring, because it mentions avalanche stuff?

Checked the route catalog - wait, there's barely any ski tours here and it's a bunch of random hikes from around the country. Why is avalanche risk highlighted when 99% of hikers are probably gonna stay home if there's a big snowstorm? Is this by chance your personal hiking history? Why these hikes in particular?

Are avalanches the only way someone can die outdoors? What about snake bites, heat exhaustion, drowning etc.?

I am not sure what the app actually does vs gaia, alltrails, nwac app. The site only has one screenshot. What does this app add?

reply
lukeasch21
1 hour ago
[-]
Unfortunately I think you've given far more thought into the concept than OP has
reply
metacritic12
1 hour ago
[-]
Possibly because OP might have one-shot vibe-coded this app with a single sentence as an LLM wrapper.
reply
metacritic12
1 hour ago
[-]
Flagging for clickbait title. It's deliberately obfuscating to intrigue users into clicking.

A better plain title would be

Strata: An LLM App that Tells You If Your Hiking Route Today is Likely Safe.

reply
alfalfasprout
1 hour ago
[-]
This is going to kill someone... you can't just make these calls for people. And it's DEFINITELY not a replacement for snowpack tests, etc. at the location you're going to visit.
reply
jstrong
1 hour ago
[-]
hoping this is a joke
reply
jobs_throwaway
1 hour ago
[-]
Classic HN responses ITT. Very Reddit-like in its absolute knee-knocking fear at any kind of liability/rule-breaking
reply
Barbing
1 hour ago
[-]
Yeah, the app "tells you...whether today is a go", which is completely responsible and I'm not sure how HN could be able to miss it!

Jokes aside, couple changes come to mind:

- pitch more carefully as "may indicate when danger may be elevated"

- in app, on calm days insist "while prelim scan found nothing anomalous, click these links to find the original forecasts"

As of today, with this tech for this use case, the warnings should be the lede. Otherwise you're even more likely to have a "'Full' Self Driving" situation where we're lured into a false sense of safety.

reply
planewave
1 hour ago
[-]
I’m not so sure mocking is really that on point, a tool used to understand avalanche safety should be safe. The product copy highlights safety and the value of providing a recommendation instead of having to collate and synthesize different data yourself.

Avalanche risk and its management are unknown to me, but not to ski patrols, experienced backcountry trekkers, scientists, and national weather services of many countries, etc. I saw no evidence of trials to test to see how the technology performs against real conditions.

If you can’t trust this product’s recommendations within some margin of safety then it’s value proposition disappears.

Why not market it instead as an experiment and seek some way of collecting data to improve the process or develop a model fine tuned to the inputs?

reply
devmor
1 hour ago
[-]
Yeah, let’s not let a little thing like safety get in the way of disrupting the “staying alive” paradigm.
reply