Copy That Floppy – Cambridge guide for preserving data from fragile floppy disks
105 points
9 hours ago
| 12 comments
| digipres.org
| HN
felooboolooomba
1 hour ago
[-]
As a kid back then, floppies were expensive if you were using your pocket money or hard earned side hustle stash. Floppies were used, abused and reused until that dreadful bad sector. Even after the bad sector if you knew its location. But you knew the floppy time was up.

Kids today will newer know the feeling of unwrapping a fresh package of 10 floppies. The sound, the smell, the texture, the stickers, the formatting, the wast free space, ... as much as retail therapy is a thing, I think that was floppy therapy.

reply
artisinal
1 hour ago
[-]
> the feeling of unwrapping a fresh package of 10 floppies

For us floppies just appeared in the home! I think my dad took them from the office so he could work from home.

reply
tmountain
4 hours ago
[-]
Floppy disks were ubiquitous when I was in college. When I got into Linux, I did an experiment raw writing zeros to floppies with dd to see what percentage of them had I/O errors. I tested with a stack of about 50 of them that were left in our computer lab over the years (different brands). The failure rate was staggering. Something like 30-40% of them had bad sectors. After that, I realized that I could never rely on them as a storage medium for anything important without regular backups.
reply
pdw
3 hours ago
[-]
Floppy reliability dropped of a cliff in the mid-90s. It came to a point where it wasn't unusual to see I/O errors even on completely new floppies.

But with older drives and older media, produced to a higher standard, they were pretty reliable. (After all, IBM invented them to store CPU microcode, they had to be.)

reply
HPsquared
4 hours ago
[-]
I wonder if anyone made an error correcting driver or file format for unreliable data storage like this. Did anyone ever implement RAId (redundant array of independent diskettes)? Edit: apparently RAR had an option to add internal error correction data to the archive, and you can also use PAR2 files for another layer (I think that's able to reconstruct the archive if one file is totally unreadable)
reply
6LLvveMx2koXfwn
4 hours ago
[-]
. . . simultaneously over-writing the last remaining copy of the original Linux!
reply
Dwedit
1 hour ago
[-]
The rule for preserving floppies is to not use Windows. Windows is known for automatically writing to disks, so you're not preserving the original anymore, you're preserving the changes that Windows made to the disk.
reply
hypercube33
51 minutes ago
[-]
Dont most disks have write protection? Would that not be sufficient?
reply
SilverBirch
2 hours ago
[-]
reply
djmips
4 hours ago
[-]
I can't afford an the recommended Applesauce for Apple II disk preservation so I'm hoping that the Adafruit work which added Apple II drive support will work for me.

https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Floppy

reply
mune2gu-chan
8 hours ago
[-]
It's easy to forget that preserving digital data often comes down to keeping aging physical media alive. Nice practical guide.
reply
jandrese
7 hours ago
[-]
Generally it's easier to just copy the data to each new media as you adopt it. In the past this was pretty easy to do as the hard drive held way more data than the floppy disks of old. The next hard drive was an order of magnitude larger than the old one, and so on. Unfortunately this sputtered out during the SSD transition and became even more ephemeral as people started putting data in the cloud where it will eventually be wiped when the accounts stop being paid or lost when the company goes under.
reply
mystifyingpoi
6 hours ago
[-]
> when the company goes under > when the accounts stop being paid

I've never experienced such case, did you?

Something much more likely is for a person to drop their phone into the toilet, buy a new one, and completely lose access to their only backup which is Google Photos, because they don't own a computer anymore and it is their only device.

reply
biofox
5 hours ago
[-]
I lost the only recordings of my band when Myspace Music died.

At one point, I also had files on RapidShare. They probably weren't of any value, but I have no idea what they were now.

reply
crtasm
2 hours ago
[-]
In case you hadn't heard, there's a sizable archive here https://archive.org/details/myspace_dragon_hoard_2010

and I see another collection mentioned on: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19569865

reply
ralferoo
3 hours ago
[-]
What happened to the original files that you uploaded to Myspace?

Why wouldn't you have made any attempt to preserve any of copy of your data anyway? Even if you believed the files would stay online forever, it's surely always more convenient to use local files than re-download every time?

(but also sorry you lost your last physical copy of your memories, that kind of sucks and sorry if my comment comes across as quite insensitive)

reply
st_goliath
5 hours ago
[-]
> The next hard drive was an order of magnitude larger than the old one, and so on.

Ah yes, the good old "old PC" folder that you would find on pretty much every Windows PC that used to have another "old PC" folder inside it somewhere, possibly inside an "external HDD (old)" folder :-)

Until the PC (or the HDD inside it) died surprisingly, people didn't have backups, or the backups turned out to be burned CDs that were scratched up and/or sat on a sun illuminated shelf for years.

I was at a class reunion a few years ago where it turned out, I was somehow the only one who still had (digital) photos from early-to-mid 2000s.

> ... even more ephemeral as people started putting data in the cloud where it will eventually be wiped when the accounts stop being paid or lost when the company goes under.

Or the photos they upload gradually degrade in quality as the company repeatedly plays with re-compressing stuff to squeeze more space out.

People have observed old (10+ years) photos on Google Drive to start getting blurry, having weird artifacts, color banding, etc... IIRC there was an article posted on HN at one point with some particular egregious examples. Techmoan also mentioned this in a video some time ago, commenting that the same thing happened to old YouTube uploads of his from the 2000s.

reply
ralferoo
3 hours ago
[-]
Hehe, I used to create a folder as some variant of "Old" and move everything in my downloads folder into it once or twice a year, and with a lesser frequency my documents. At one point when I realised this had got about 10 levels deep, I switched to yyyy-mm format directories instead of nesting them.

I also used to back up other PCs to each other somewhat regularly, and sometimes I'd end up with those files back on the original PC in a backup of another. Fortunately, when I switched to borgbackup on Windows as well [1], this massive reduplication of files became a solved problem.

[1] borgbackup doesn't officially work on Windows, but I run it in WSL which does reasonably well for all the files I really care about (i.e. the stuff I've made). When they have particular unusual characters in the filenames, it throws up a warning for that file every time, but otherwise seems fine. I've never bothered investigating whether those particular files restore to the correct filename, because I know I've also backed up the zip file those files have come from and it's just accidental that I've backed up the extracted files as well.

reply
BrenBarn
3 hours ago
[-]
I still have a bunch of these called "FromOld".
reply
organsnyder
2 hours ago
[-]
Same! It's in Dropbox now. I found the source from the very first code I got paid to write, back in 1998. I was 14, and mostly self-taught. One of these days I'm going to run it through static analysis and see how many security holes there were.
reply
ant6n
6 hours ago
[-]
Dropbox has been around for a while (cue that old hacker news comment)
reply
Frieren
2 hours ago
[-]
> Not all red or unreadable sectors necessarily indicate failure. Many copy-protected disks include intentionally malformed sectors that cannot be read by standard logic.

How they know? ;)

reply
icevl
2 hours ago
[-]
Nice guide. I like the focus on preservation rather than just "getting the files off the disk".
reply
gnabgib
8 hours ago
[-]
Where'd you get the title from? It's just Copy That Floppy! (maybe +Imaging floppy disks for long-term preservation if it fits)
reply
esafak
7 hours ago
[-]
reply
jonathanoliver
6 hours ago
[-]
I came here just to post that link. I still have that song in my head when I hear the word "floppy".
reply
girishso
2 hours ago
[-]
Any suggestions for copying files from the old CD or DVD?
reply
yigalirani
3 hours ago
[-]
Last time that I had to use flopping disc was when the Chicago movie came out that was 2002. 24 years ago. And even that was for one off project after several years of not using it
reply
demute
5 hours ago
[-]
Efficient market hypothesis applied to this topic would say that if you really do have a floppy, you should already have made a copy of it. If that’s Not the case, transform it to a punched card and be done with it.

The chance that one would have anything important on a floppy that is not already backed up in the year of 2026 must be close to zero.

reply
RetroTechie
1 hour ago
[-]
> The chance that one would have anything important on a floppy that is not already backed up in the year of 2026 must be close to zero.

In the case of personal files: probably true. Who needs 20y old tax filings.

But there are exceptions. For example: sometimes games were released (binary only), decades later an author dies, relatives clean out the attic & flog some old computer junk on eBay, buyer goes through the stuff & discovers source code for a game that was believed to be lost long ago.

Or a never-released book manuscript is discovered in similar fashion.

It's not often, but it does happen.

reply