Every time I do use it, it's usually incorrect and just adds time to the task. I nearly always end up having to refer to a physical book or previously written notes to get the answer I need.
I have no ill will towards anybody who does use it nor do I care who uses it – It's their choice if they would rather defer to a machine to make simple decisions.
But you should never trust it completely. A lot of people have already died because they trusted it with their lives. "Full self driving" isn't.
Please explain why my 82 year-old mother-in-law needs to use AI. Is it just so you won't consider her arrogant?
[1] Assuming that if LLMs were that good, all code would presently be double checked and exploits and back doors will shortly coming to an end - unless the reason it hasn't is a marketing issue.
There are some who exhibit arrogance/aggression and like to virtue signalling to us other mere mortals, which is annoying.
Nonetheless, I preferred life before LLMs. Now I'm making the best of a bad situation, and going with the flow. Too old to fight a losing battle.
However, some programmers believe that "AI can't program" with their last time using an LLM was years ago, which is more ignorant of current trends than arrogant.