A new way to reflect on how you use Claude
36 points
2 hours ago
| 14 comments
| anthropic.com
| HN
AlexErrant
21 minutes ago
[-]
> If you can't generate a report, it may be because you don’t have Memory turned on.

Has anyone found success with memory and Claude Code? I found Opus's 4.8 memories largely lacking value. Memories are too verbose/specific/yet-generic for the value captured.

Instead, I've been holding "retros" with the agent immediately after a session, and _those_ responses have been typically fantastic. It has ideas for coding changes, spots unmentioned small bugs, suggests invariants, principles to adopt, lint rules, tooling tweaks, skill-file updates, follow up work, all kinds of stuff.

reply
8cvor6j844qw_d6
11 minutes ago
[-]
> I found Opus's 4.8 memories largely lacking value.

Similar thoughts, I disabled memory for the web UI.

> I've been holding "retros" with the agent immediately after a session, and _those_ responses have been typically fantastic.

I used a skill instead to update a ai docs directory as needed.

In any case, I'm moving coding tasks to Codex, Claude will be demoted to frontend design only. I will not entertain the idea of API billing/extra usage or a 2nd Max account once the extra 50% Claude Code usage limits ends on 13 July [1].

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126429

reply
piva00
13 minutes ago
[-]
Memories have mostly been detrimental to me, I have disabled it completely after many moments of frustration.

In general Claude would decide to save irrelevant memories, or apply a memory that was lifted during work on a project to a completely different context where it wasn't relevant, or saved a memory from how to use a tool while I was experimenting with the toll and silently apply it breaking my workflow.

I can't remember a single instance where it was helpful so I just disabled it to not have to deal with yet another cognitive overload.

reply
ventana
51 minutes ago
[-]
I just feel that any attempt of a service I use to summarize and analyze my interactions with it, whether it's the AI tool usage patterns or the music I listened to the most over the past year, makes me feel creepy and makes me want to use the service less. Imagine if your local grocery store came back to you saying that you ate this many chocolate bars over the year. Thanks, I know that you know that, but I don't want you to show me that you know that.
reply
Retr0id
45 minutes ago
[-]
I feel this way too except for the music one. The whole reason I use spotify is because I want their algorithm to figure out what music I like.
reply
MisterTea
33 minutes ago
[-]
> ... figure out what music I like.

Isn't that something you determine yourself? I listen to a lot of heavy metal because I like it. I also wander around bandcamp and find stuff that isn't heavy metal, but enjoyable, so I buy it. My brain is my algorithm.

reply
Retr0id
20 minutes ago
[-]
I do determine it for myself but sometimes I just want to hit play and hear new stuff.
reply
arccy
19 minutes ago
[-]
not everyone has the time to trawl through thousands of bands to find music they like
reply
pavel_lishin
1 hour ago
[-]
> In our interviews with users, a common theme that’s emerged is a desire to better understand how, exactly, AI can be integrated into daily life.

I don't want to integrate AI into daily life.

reply
s3r3nity
1 hour ago
[-]
Then…don’t? You are free to not do so, while others (like myself) can choose the opposite.
reply
sumeno
1 hour ago
[-]
Tell that to our employers
reply
pc86
27 minutes ago
[-]
Using AI for specific tasks at work is definitionally not "integrating AI into your life."

You might use a badge to open a door at work but that doesn't mean your integrating badge-door access control systems into your daily life. It's a tool that you only use at work.

reply
nDRDY
1 hour ago
[-]
>how, exactly, AI can be integrated into daily life.

Aka "what is it good for?"

reply
asd88
1 hour ago
[-]
To be fair, the article doesn’t quite deliver on this promise. The examples are mostly focused on improving work-related workflows, so I guess that’s what they think “daily life” is.
reply
pc86
26 minutes ago
[-]
To most of the people working on these AI systems I'm willing to bet work in 90% of their waking life or more.
reply
InTheArena
1 hour ago
[-]
Then this isn’t for you. That’s fine.
reply
tyleo
1 hour ago
[-]
Meh, I have it integrated as a replacement for search engines at this point.

I don’t even know that Claude is inherently better or if it’s more the lack of ads.

reply
jerf
29 minutes ago
[-]
When I have a good idea that I can hit what I want in a single query, I still use search engines directly a lot. But I have found AI is pretty decent at automating the process of making a vague search, picking up from the search better search terms, then making a couple of other wrong searches, then refining down to what I really want and potentially pulling together an answer from multiple sources. I know how to do all that, but the AI can do in a minute what may take me 15 minutes.

I'd say I also know I can still do it, but... as the search engines deteriorate it is getting somewhat harder to do this by hand than it used to be. I still do this by hand sometimes for cases where I want the exploration of a topic for myself, rather than a focused answer where I don't really care about what I learn along the way, and it's getting harder. I don't know that it'll converge at "zero value" but the search result pages seem like they're just... harder to use for this than they used to be, though it's hard to put my finger on how.

reply
pavel_lishin
1 hour ago
[-]
I'd argue that it's not that Claude is better, but that Google has gotten worse.
reply
Insanity
1 hour ago
[-]
I did this but have (partly) reverted. I don't always want to read a wall of text that an AI regurgitates for search. The google AI snippet (1 short para) does seem better than the typical ChatGPT response.
reply
passivegains
1 hour ago
[-]
I don't know why this sentiment isn't more common. LLMs are basically two things: 1. chatbots 2. automation for the process of googling something and copy-pasting the first result. The only people I know who use it for more than those two things ask them to perform tasks they can't do reliably, don't check the output, and then they're just wrong most of the time. If they had just used it as slightly different google search they'd have been fine.
reply
WolfeReader
1 hour ago
[-]
Search engines without ads exist.

Try noai.duckduckgo.com. Decent search results, actual sources, no risk of hallucination, no extreme energy cost.

reply
chrisweekly
40 minutes ago
[-]
Kagi is an even better option, IME.
reply
AlienRobot
28 minutes ago
[-]
"Cool product you have there... but what is it for?"
reply
setnone
11 minutes ago
[-]
> It lets you easily track and visualize how you use Claude, and decide whether that time aligns with your goals.

i haven't yet encountered/achieved ai summarization technique nuanced enough to be called reflection and this seems basic too with no mention of behavioural patterns or workflow suitability

reply
aabhay
28 minutes ago
[-]
This product feels bad and sloppy, so I’ll give my hypothesis for why this was built:

At this point, Anthropic is likely having Claude itself propose and build features autonomously based on providing it with raw user feedback. This could be one example. Which is why it has an eerie sense of redundancy and pointlessness (“You mostly used Claude to automate work and home tasks”, etc.).

reply
rethab
1 hour ago
[-]
In claude code, there's a built-in skill `/insights` which gives you a report on how you've been using claude code and where you could improve.
reply
ch4s3
1 hour ago
[-]
Is it any good?
reply
sd9
1 hour ago
[-]
No, it’s superficial slop

Speaking as a big proponent of Claude code in general, which I find to be revolutionary and useful - there is no value in that report. To be honest, the people who I know who like that report are the ones who are getting sycophantically gaslit by the models more than they should.

reply
nottorp
56 minutes ago
[-]
> which I find to be revolutionary and useful - there is no value in that report

:) I went through some Claude documentation that apparently came with my job's paid subscription.

Besides some vague description of how to use the API, it was just fluff. For example there were exactly zero hints on how to do your prompts.

reply
darepublic
42 minutes ago
[-]
How people prompt and the output that ensues is valuable data. So they would probably want variety as a free live experiment.
reply
nottorp
35 minutes ago
[-]
So a paid product that comes with no documentation, basically.
reply
headcanon
35 minutes ago
[-]
agreed, but IMO thats been true for most off-the-shelf skills I've seen. Instead I built my own "/meta" skill to improve my workflows, which I can use in targeted ways across my projects
reply
HarHarVeryFunny
36 minutes ago
[-]
I've integrated AI into my daily life by installing the Gemini voice app onto my phone, which I typically may use once a week, and adding Gemini and Claude bookmarks to my browser which I use all the time - but mostly Gemini since free usage is effectively unlimited.

That's all the integration I need. I don't need OpenClaw running 24x7 trying to hack it's way into my gmail.

reply
lilerjee
32 minutes ago
[-]
It seems said "Your way to use Claude is wrong somehow, you should improve the way to use AI", instead of "Our tools have some wrong aspects and we will do our best to improve them".
reply
estearum
28 minutes ago
[-]
It's actually quite normal to try to acquire skill at using tools. It's very normal for toolmakers to share insights and expertise in how best to use the tools they sell.
reply
GPerson
16 minutes ago
[-]
Is anthropic paying you guys for all this free advertising dang? This is pathetic.
reply
sometimes_all
51 minutes ago
[-]
Interesting, I am not able to see it, and I have memory enabled.
reply
doby111
1 hour ago
[-]
For most people, I guess it will say you need to take an English grammer course and draft your own email.
reply
kgwgk
1 hour ago
[-]
> you need to take an English grammer course

And a spolling one too.

reply
WolfeReader
7 minutes ago
[-]
It is inevitable that a post criticizing grammar or spelling will, itself, contain a grammar or spilling error.
reply
pavel_lishin
1 hour ago
[-]
Why would a product talk its users out of using it?
reply
passivegains
1 hour ago
[-]
Remember that time grok told people not to use it for second opinions on their medical records? ...on second thought that might be an exception that proves the rule.
reply
bob1029
1 hour ago
[-]
This looks like mindless data tourism to me. I don't see much distinction between this and something like Spotify's annual "wrapped" feature. The information theoretical equivalent of junk food.
reply
empath75
31 minutes ago
[-]
I think there's a germ of a good idea here, but really this needs to be data that is presented in a way that encourages human thought and interpretation and not something claude predigests and interprets _for_ you. I found the whole tone as it's executed incredibly off-putting and cringe inducing.
reply
josefritzishere
1 hour ago
[-]
This reads very promotional, like an ad.
reply