When I asked other AI to review it, chaos ensued. Bugs were found, concepts were iterated, and I learned my original comment was actually confused. But when the dust settled, the various AI could not agree on the post's final form. So I had to be the one to make the call.
I'm imagining this second article (which summarizes that decision process) would be of more interest to the HackerNews crowd than the original C++ esoterica.