FCC plans ID mandate that could block anonymous use of prepaid burner phones
6 points
by dynm
11 hours ago
| 1 comment
| arstechnica.com
| HN
nullc
8 hours ago
[-]
Comments are closed, but they're open for responses.

By my count there were 533 replies that were responsive to the 'enhanced' KYC requirements. ~496 opposing it, and ~37 substantively supporting it.

I used deepseek 4 flash with a rubric I wrote to run the responses against each other in a tournament.

Here are some of the stronger responses against:

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/105288...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261098...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261098...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099... (mine)

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/106110...

And here are some of the stronger argument for, which you might want to rebut:

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/106090...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/105150...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261098...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

* https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/261099...

reply